419
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Assessment of quality of life and psychological repercussions in women with endometriosis according to pain intensity

, , , ORCID Icon &
Pages 660-669 | Received 01 Feb 2022, Accepted 01 Sep 2022, Published online: 07 Sep 2022
 

ABSTRACT

The objective is to evaluate quality of life, anxiety, and depression in women with endometriosis, and to correlate these parameters with pain intensity. This multicenter cross-sectional study was conducted on 102 women with endometriosis from 2017 to 2020. The women were divided into two groups according to the pain intensity: group 1 (severe pain, 62 women) and group 2 (mild/moderate pain, 40 women). The Endometriosis Health Profile Questionnaire, Beck Anxiety Inventory, and Beck Depression Inventory were used to assess quality of life and levels of anxiety and depression, respectively. In both groups, mean age and mean body mass index were similar (p˃ 0.5). Most women had deep endometriosis and were on treatment, but group 2 had a longer treatment time (p = 0.044). Group 1 exhibited more depression and anxiety than group 2 (17.1 ± 9.98 vs. 11.15 ± 9.25, p = 0.003 and 23.71 ± 12.92 vs 12.58 ± 10.53, p = 0.001, respectively). Women with high pain had a significantly worse quality of life than those with low pain (48.88 ± 16.02 vs. 23.32 ± 15.93, p < 0.001). Women with endometriosis and high pain intensity have a worse quality of life, and more severe levels of anxiety and depression.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Helymar da Costa Machado, a statistician at UNICAMP Women’s Hospital, for their contribution to the statistical analysis.

Data availability statement

The data sets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Author contributions

D.A. Yela conceptualized and designed the study. She was also involved in the interpretation of the results, and wrote and reviewed the manuscript. M.B. Meneguetti, F.P. Siva, and G.N. Dias conceptualized and designed the study, and helped in the acquisition of the data, interpretation of results, and writing of the manuscript. C.L. Benetti-Pinto reviewed the manuscript.

Additional information

Funding

The author(s) reported there is no funding associated with the work featured in this article.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 402.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.