693
Views
19
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Reviews

Intrapartum cardiotocography with and without computer analysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

, , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , , , , , , , , & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 2284-2290 | Received 02 Jun 2018, Accepted 28 Oct 2018, Published online: 18 Nov 2018
 

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate whether intrapartum cardiotocography with computer analysis decreases the incidence of newborn metabolic acidosis or obstetric intervention when compared with visual analysis through a systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Methods: The research was conducted using Medline, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, ClinicalTrial.gov, Ovid and Cochrane Library as electronic databases from the inception of each database to May 2018. Selection criteria included randomized trial evaluating women with cephalic presentation at term or late preterm term during labor who were randomized to electronic fetal heart rate monitoring with either computer analysis (i.e. intervention group) or standard visual analysis (i.e. control group). Trials evaluating antenatal fetal heart rate monitoring in women not in labor were excluded. The primary outcome was incidence of newborn metabolic acidosis, defined as pH less than 7.05 and base deficit greater than 12 mmol/L. Secondary outcomes were mode of delivery, admission to neonatal intensive care unit, hypoxic–ischemic encephalopathy, and perinatal death. The summary measures were reported as relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI).

Results: Three randomized controlled trials (RCTs), including 54,492 participants, which met inclusion criteria for this meta-analysis, were analyzed. All the included trials enrolled women with cephalic presentation at term or late preterm. Women were randomized in the active first stage of labor and all of them received continuous cardiotocography (CTG) from randomization until delivery. Women who received continuous CTG during labor with computerized analysis had similar risk of newborn metabolic acidosis. No between group differences were found in the secondary outcomes.

Conclusions: Compared with visual analysis, use of computer analysis of fetal monitoring signals during labor did not significantly reduce the rate of metabolic acidosis or obstetric intervention.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access
  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart
* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.