Intrapartum cardiotocography with and without computer analysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

References

• Committee on Obstetric Practice. Committee opinion. Obstet Gynecol. 2002;99(4):679–680.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alfireviz Z, Devan D, Gyte GM. Continuous cardiotocography (CTG) as a form of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) for fetal assessment during labor. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;3:CD006066.
   Google Scholar
• Saccone G, Schuit E, Amer-Wåhlin I, et al. Electrocardiogram ST analysis during labor: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Obstet Gynecol. Review. 2016;127(1):127–135. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000001198
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xodo S, Saccone G, Schuit E, et al. Why STAN might not be dead. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017;30(19):2306–2308. doi:10.1080/14767058.2016.1247263
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions, version 5.1.0 (update March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration; 2011. [cited 2018 May 20]. Available from: training.cochrane.org/handbook.
   Google Scholar
• Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the Prisma statement. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62(10):1006–1012. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ignatov PN, Lutomski JE. Quantitative cardiotocography to improve fetal assessment during labor: a preliminary randomized controlled trial. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016;205:91–97. doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.08.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunes I, Ayres-de-Campos D, Ugwumadu A, et al. Central fetal monitoring with and without computer analysis: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;129(1):83–90. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000001799
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• INFANT Collaborative Group. Computerised interpretation of fetal heart rate during labour (INFANT): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2017;389(10080):1719–1729. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30568-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoen CN, Saccone G, Backley S, et al. Increased single-balloon Foley catheter volume for induction of labor and time to delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2018;97(9):1051–1060. doi:10.1111/aogs.13353
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saccone G, Caissutti C, Ciardulli A, et al. Uterine massage for preventing postpartum hemorrhage at cesarean delivery: which evidence? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018;223:64–67. doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.02.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saccone G, Ciardulli A, Baxter JK, et al. Discontinuing oxytocin infusion in the active phase of labor: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;130(5):1090–1096. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000002325
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saccone G, Caissutti C, Ciardulli A, et al. Uterine massage as part of active management of the third stage of labor for preventing postpartum hemorrhage during vaginal delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. BJOG. 2018;125(7):778–781.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caissutti C, Saccone G, Zullo F, et al. Vaginal cleansing before cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;130(3):527–538. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000002167
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciardulli A, Saccone G, Di Mascio D, et al. Chewing gum improves postoperative recovery of gastrointestinal function after cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018;31(14):1924–1932. doi:10.1080/14767058.2017.1330883
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehsanipoor RM, Saccone G, Seligman NS, et al. Intravenous fluid rate for reduction of cesarean delivery rate in nulliparous women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2017;96(7):804–811. doi:10.1111/aogs.13121
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciardulli A, Saccone G, Anastasio H, et al. Less-restrictive food intake during labor in low-risk singleton pregnancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;129(3):473–480. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000001898
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Spiezio Sardo A, Saccone G, McCurdy R, et al. Risk of cesarean scar defect following single- vs double-layer uterine closure: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017;50(5):578–583. doi:10.1002/uog.17401
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta JK, Sood A, Hofmeyr GJ, et al. Position in the second stage of labour for women without epidural anaesthesia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 25;5:CD002006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aasheim V, Nilsen ABV, Reinar LM, et al. Perineal techniques during the second stage of labour for reducing perineal trauma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;6:CD006672.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pardey J, Moulden M, Redman CW. A computer system for the numerical analysis of nonstress tests. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186(5):1095–1103. doi:10.1067/mob.2002.122447
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawes GS, Moulden M, Redman CW. System 8000: computerized antenatal FHR analysis. J Perinat Med. 1991;19(1–2):47–51. doi:10.1515/jpme.1991.19.1-2.47
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lees CC, Marlow N, van Wassenaer-Leemhuis A, et al. 2 Year neurodevelopmental and intermediate perinatal outcomes in infants with very preterm fetal growth restriction (TRUFFLE): a randomised trial. Lancet. 2015;385(9983):2162–2172. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62049-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lobmaier SM, Mensing van Charante N, Ferrazzi E, et al. Phase-rectified signal averaging method to predict perinatal outcome in infants with very preterm fetal growth restriction – a secondary analysis of TRUFFLE-trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;215(5):630.e1–630.e7. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2016.06.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayres-de-Campos D. Electronic fetal monitoring or cardiotocography, 50 years later: what’s in a name? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;218(6):545–546. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2018.03.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayres-de-Campos D, Costa-Santos C, Bernardes J, et al. Prediction of neonatal state by computer analysis of fetal heart rate tracings: the antepartum arm of the SisPorto multicentre validation study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2005;118(1):52–60. doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2004.04.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayres-de-Campos D, Spong CY, Chandraharan E, et al. FIGO consensus guidelines on intrapartum fetal monitoring: cardiotocography. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2015;131(1):13–24. doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.06.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar