365
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Consolidating regulatory and personal accounts of student migration: a mixed methods study in the UK and Japan

Pages 33-54 | Received 08 Dec 2020, Accepted 06 Dec 2021, Published online: 21 Dec 2021
 

ABSTRACT

Taking the UK and Japan as contrasting national case studies, this article supplements existing research into student migration by consolidating a regulatory perspective with individual narrative accounts. Reported here are the results of a mixed-methods two-phase study. Phase 1 is a concerted trajectory analysis of student migration policy in the UK and Japan from 2004 to 2018, while phase 2 draws on biographical-narrative interviews with 26 student-migrants. The paper reveals tangible effects of the receptivity, stability, and transparency of regulatory frameworks in student-migrants’ trajectories, while also demonstrating that seemingly receptive regulatory environments do not necessarily equate to smooth and risk-free post-study transitions.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Notes

1 As Hollifield describes, ‘the economic logic of liberalism is one of openness, but the political and legal logic is one of closure’, and the result of this ‘paradox’ is persistent tension between the competing imperatives of international openness and national security (Hollifield Citation1992, Citation2004).

2 Indeed, the Conservative government, elected in December 2019, has stated that it hopes to re-implement a two-year PSWV (Home Office Citation2019).

3 Despite an historic aversion to immigration, the chronic challenges of a low birth-rate and demographic decline have caused a softening in opposition to inbound migration to Japan (Komine Citation2018; Yonezawa Citation2020).

4 Japan has since been surpassed by China as the leading host of international students in East Asia.

5 Participants chose their own pseudonyms at the time of the first interview.

6 Universities typically create and distribute original documents for this purpose. A typical example is available from Ritsumeikan University (Citation2019).

7 Notably, this pathway was closed on July 6th, 2019.

8 Australia, Canada, Japan, Monaco, New Zealand, Hong Kong, and Taiwan (as well as British overseas [territories] citizens, and British nationals [overseas]).

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by Economic and Social Research Council [grant number 1813146,ES/M010082/1]; JSPS [grant number PE17721R].

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 314.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.