729
Views
16
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Mathematics teachers’ ability to identify situations appropriate for proportional reasoning

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 233-250 | Received 18 May 2018, Accepted 18 Jan 2019, Published online: 30 Apr 2019
 

ABSTRACT

In this study, we investigated teachers’ abilities correctly to identify situations that are appropriate for proportional reasoning and factors that might influence their ability using data on 148 teachers from the U.S. Learning Mathematics for Teaching assessment and other, similar items (with a smaller sample). Through a quantitative exploratory data analysis, we found middle school mathematics teachers are relatively proficient at correctly identifying situations that are proportional. However, we also found these same teachers were challenged by identifying situations as appropriate for proportional reasoning when in fact they were not, particularly in linear cases with a non-trivial constant term or inversely proportional situations. We also examined teachers’ backgrounds and perceived expertise to determine whether there were correlations between their abilities to discern proportional situations and these attributes. We found that teachers are relatively proficient at self-assessing their expertise. Our findings imply that the middle school mathematics teachers in our study seemed to over-identify situations as proportional even when the situations were not proportional.

Acknowledgements

The views expressed here reflect those of the authors and may not necessarily be the views of the NSF. The authors wish to thank James Burke for his work on earlier versions of this paper. They also wish to thank Heather Hill for allowing them access to the national dataset from the Learning Mathematics for Teaching Proportional Reasoning form.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Funding

The work reported here was support by grant number DRL-1054170 from the National Science Foundation's Division of Research on Learning in Formal and Informal Settings.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 342.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.