83
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Correspondence

Finding Our Balance in the Asymmetry Debate

Pages W4-W7 | Published online: 27 Jul 2021
 
This article refers to:
Conscience Clauses and Ideological Bias
Putting the Asymmetry Debate in Its Place
Justified Asymmetries: Positive and Negative Claims to Conscience in Reproductive Health Care
Unjustified Asymmetry: Positive Claims of Conscience and Heartbeat Bills
Justifying Positive Appeals to Conscience: The Debate We Can’t Avoid
Conscience Claims and Cost: Tribunals and the Asymmetry Debate
Medical Disobedience and the Conscientious Provision of Prohibited Care
What Makes Conscientious Refusals Concerning Abortion Different
The Wrong Argument for a Bad Law
Does Medicine Need to Accommodate Positive Conscientious Objections to Morally Self-Correct?

Notes

1 Fox Citation2021 suggests that one necessary criterion for determining which PCCs we should allow is that such claims comply with the professional standard of care. This same question applies to Fox’s suggestion: Who determines such standards, and how?

2 Thanks to Casey Woolwine for helpful feedback on an earlier draft of this paper.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 137.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.