Advanced search
Publication Cover
The American Journal of Bioethics Volume 21, 2021 - Issue 8
Submit an article Journal homepage
83
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Correspondence

Finding Our Balance in the Asymmetry Debate

Kyle G. FritzUniversity of MississippiCorrespondence[email protected]
ORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2961-384X
ORCID Icon
Pages W4-W7 | Published online: 27 Jul 2021

REFERENCES

  • Brummett, A. 2021. Putting the asymmetry debate in its place. The American Journal of Bioethics 21 (8):68–69. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2021.1940357.
  • Eberl, J. T. 2021. What makes conscientious refusals concerning abortion different. The American Journal of Bioethics 21 (8):62–64. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2021.1940372.
  • Fox, D. 2021. Medical disobedience and the conscientious provision of prohibited care. The American Journal of Bioethics 21 (8):72–74. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2021.1940361.
  • Fritz, K. G. 2021. Unjustified asymmetry: Positive claims of conscience and heartbeat bills. The American Journal of Bioethics 21 (8):46–59. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2021.1863514.
  • Giubilini, A. 2014. The paradox of conscientious objection and the anemic concept of ‘conscience’: Downplaying the role of moral integrity in health care. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 24(2):159–85. doi: 10.1353/ken.2014.0011.
  • Haddad, L. B., and N. M. Nour. 2009. Unsafe abortion: Unnecessary maternal mortality. Reviews in Obstetrics & Gynecology 2 (2):122–126.
  • Kim, E. J., and K. Ferguson 2021. Does medicine need to accommodate positive conscientious objections to morally self-correct? The American Journal of Bioethics 21 (8):74–76. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2021.1940362.
  • Mathison, E. 2021. The wrong argument for a bad law. The American Journal of Bioethics 21 (8):77–79. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2021.1940360.
  • McLeod, C. 2021. Justified asymmetries: Positive and negative claims to conscience in reproductive health care. The American Journal of Bioethics 21 (8):60–62. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2021.1940368.
  • Miller, D. 2021. Justifying positive appeals to conscience: The debate we can’t avoid. The American Journal of Bioethics 21 (8):79–81. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2021.1940356.
  • Thomson, J. J. 1971. A defense of abortion. Philosophy and Public Affairs 1 (1):47–66.
  • Vaughan, D. M., and L. Campo-Engelstein. 2021. Conscience claims and cost: Tribunals and the asymmetry debate. The American Journal of Bioethics 21 (8):70–72. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2021.1940367.
  • Wicclair, M. R. 2011. Conscientious objection in health care: An ethical analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Wicclair, M. R. 2021. Conscience clauses and ideological bias. The American Journal of Bioethics 21 (8):65–67. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2021.1940369.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.