Publication Cover
LEUKOS
The Journal of the Illuminating Engineering Society
Volume 18, 2022 - Issue 2
295
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Impact of Color Matching Primaries on Observer Matching: Part II – Observer Variability

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 127-144 | Received 26 Jun 2020, Accepted 11 Dec 2020, Published online: 25 Feb 2021
 

ABSTRACT

In this study, the observer variability in a 10° achromatic color matching experiment using systematically different primaries under immersive, perceptually neutral (4673 K) and stable adapted viewing conditions have been investigated for four different sets of CIE color matching functions (CMFs). The matching reference was illuminated by a spectrally broadband light source at 70 cd/m2 and 4613 K. Fifty-four observers varying in age, gender, ethnicity and eye color participated. The results indicate that certain wavelength regions are more sensitive to generate interobserver variability, such as when a short wavelength primary (404 nm) was applied. Furthermore, of the primary sets investigated, that with peak-wavelengths (636–521–447 nm) close to the “typical” RGB-primaries widely known and used in industry had the smallest interobserver variability. In addition to the significant effect of primary set and CMF set, a significant effect of age on matching variability is also found, whereby the change of the blue primary resulted in a substantial difference in dispersion between younger and older observers, likely caused by age-induced yellowing of the lens. Furthermore, different primary sets tend to have a different impact on intra-observer variability than on interobserver variability. Finally, by comparing the observer variability in the current work with previous studies, the CIE standard deviate observer is found to substantially underestimate the interobserver variability, especially for the primary sets containing a 404 nm LED. Our observers also tend to have similar to smaller inter-variability than those reported in literature, possibly due to methodological differences.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Supplementary material

Supplemental data for this article can be accessed on the publisher’s website.

Additional information

Funding

The authors report no funders for the preparation of this manuscript.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 134.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.