References
- Ábrahám G, Körösi H, Schanda J, Shapiro AG, Wenzel K 1995. Anomalies in additive colour matches. Color Res Appl 20(4):235–244. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/col.5080200406.
- Alfvin RL, Fairchild MD 1997. Observer variability in metameric color matches using color reproduction media. Color Res Appl 22(3):174–188. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6378(199706)22:3<74::aid-col6>3.0.CO;2-O.
- Allen E. 1970. An index of metamerism for observer differences. In: Proceedings of the 1st AIC congress, Color 69, Musterschmidt, Göttingen, p. 771–784.
- Asano Y 2015. Individual colorimetric observers for personalized color imaging. Thesis. Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, USA.
- Asano Y, Fairchild MD 2020. Categorical observers for metamerism. Color Res Appl 45 4 576–585. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/col.22493.
- Asano Y, Fairchild MD, Blondé L 2016a. Individual colorimetric observer model. PLoS One 11(2):e0145671. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145671.
- Asano Y, Fairchild MD, Blondé L, Morvan P 2016b. Color matching experiment for highlighting interobserver variability. Color Res Appl 41(5):530–539. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/col.21975.
- Blackwell KT, Buchsbaum G 1988. The effect of spatial and chromatic parameters on chromatic induction. Color Res Appl 13(3):166–173. https://doi.org/10.1002/col.5080130309.
- Box GEP 1949. A general distribution theory for a class of likelihood criteria. Biometrika. 36(3/4):317–346. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2332671.
- Braun KM, Fairchild MD, Alessi PJ 1996. Viewing techniques for cross‐media image comparisons. Color Res Appl 21(1):6–17.
- CIE. 1986. Colorimetry. 2nd ed. Publication CIE. 15.2-1986. Central Bureau of the CIE, Vienna.
- CIE. 1989. Special metamerism index: Change in observer. Publication CIE. 080–1989. Central Bureau of the CIE, Vienna.
- CIE. 2004. Colorimetry. 3rd ed. Technical Report. Publication CIE. 015-2004. Central Bureau of the CIE, Vienna. ISBN: 978 3 9019 0633.
- CIE. 2006. Fundamental chromaticity diagram with physiological axes - part I. Technical Report. Publication CIE 170-1:2006. Central Bureau of the CIE, Vienna. ISBN: 978 3 9019 0646 6.
- CIE. 2015. Fundamental Chromaticity Diagram with Physiological Axes – Part 2: Spectral Luminous Efficiency Functions and Chromaticity Diagrams. Technical Report. Publication CIE 170‐2:2015. Central Bureau of the CIE, Vienna. ISBN: 978 3 9028 4205 3.
- CIE. 2018. Colorimetry. 4th ed. CIE. 015:2018. Central Bureau of the CIE, Vienna. doi:https://doi.org/10.25039/TR.015.2018.
- Cuttle C 2008. Lighting by Design, 2nd Edition. Oxford: Architectural Press. ISBN 978 0 7506 8768 3.
- Fairchild MD, Wyble DR 2007. Mean observer metamerism and the selection of display primaries. In: Color andImaging Conference. Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA. Vol. 2007. Society for Imaging Science and Technology. p. 151–156.
- Field AP, Miles J, Field Z 2012. Discovering statistics using R.
- Flecy L, Smet KAG 2015. RGB kleurmatching met nauwbandige en breedbandige primairen. Thesis. KU Leuven, Campus Gent.
- Friendly M, Sigal M 2018. Visualizing tests for equality of covariance matrices. Am Stat:1–23. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2018.1497537.
- Guild J 1931. The colorimetric properties of the spectrum. Encycl Earth Sci Ser 230:149–187. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2639-2_144.
- Haddad HJ, Jakstat HA, Arnetzl G, Borbely J, Vichi A, Dumfahrt H, Renault P, Corcodel N, Pohlen B, Marada G, et al. 2009. Does gender and experience influence shade matching quality? J Dent 37SUPPL 1:40–44. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2009.05.012.
- Henley SA, Fairchild MD 2000. Quantifying mixed adaptation in cross-media color reproduction. In Color and imaging conference. Scottsdale, Arizona, USA. Vol. 2000, No. 1, pp. 305–310. Society for Imaging Science and Technology.
- Houser KW, Hu X 2004. Visually matching daylight fluorescent lamplight with two primary sets†. Color Res Appl 29(6):428–437. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/col.20059.
- Hu Y, Wei M, Luo MR 2020. Observer metamerism to display white point using different primary sets. Opt Express 28(14):20305. doi:https://doi.org/10.1364/oe.395568.
- Jain N, Verma P, Mittal S, Mittal S, Singh AK, Munjal S 2010. Gender based alteration in color perception. Indian J Physiol Pharmacol 54(4):366–370.
- Judd DB 1961. A five-attribute system of describing visual appearance. Philadelphia: American Society for Testing Materials.
- Katoh N, Nakabayashi K, Ito M, Ohno S 1998. Effect of ambient light on color appearance of softcopy images: mixed chromatic adaptation for self-luminous displays. J Electron Imaging 7(4):794–807. doi:https://doi.org/10.1117/1.482665.
- Kuriki I 2015. Effect of material perception on mode of color appearance. J Vis 15(8):4. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/15.8.4.
- Li J, Hanselaer P, Smet K 2019a. The impact of matching primary peak wavelength on color matching accuracy and observer variability. 27th Color and Imaging Conference. Paris, France. Final Program and Proceedings; Society for Imaging Science and Technology. pp. 220–224 (5).
- Li J, Hanselaer P, Smet K 2019b. Pilot study on color matching accuracy using different primaries. Proceedings of the 29th CIE Session. Washington D.C., USA, June 14 – 22, 2019. p. 1010–1018.
- Li J, Hanselaer P, Smet KAG 2020. Impact of color matching primaries on observer matching: part i - accuracy, LEUKOS, 00:00, 1-23, doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15502724.2020.1864395
- Long DL, Fairchild MD 2014. Modeling observer variability and metamerism failure in electronic color displays. J Imaging Sci Technol. 58(3):304021–3040214. 10.2352.
- Ma S, Hanselaer P, Teunissen K, Smet K 2018. The influence of adapting field size on degree of chromatic adaptation. In: Proceedings of CIE 2018 “Topical Conference on Smart Lighting”, (Taipei), pp. 161–168.
- Ma S, Hanselaer P, Teunissen K, Smet KAG 2019. Impact of the starting point chromaticity on memory color matching accuracy. Opt Express 27(24):35308. doi:https://doi.org/10.1364/oe.27.035308.
- Murdoch MJ, Fairchild MD 2019. Modelling the effects of inter-observer variation on colour rendition. Light Res Technol 51(1):37–54. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1477153517744387.
- Nayatani Y, Hashimoto K, Takahama K, Sobagaki H 1985. Comparison of methods for assessing observer metamerism. Color Res Appl 10(3):147–155. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/col.5080100303.
- Nimeroff I, Rosenblatt JR, Dannemiller MC 1961. Variability of spectral tristimulus values. J Res Natl Bur Stand Phys Chem. 65A(6):475–483. doi:https://doi.org/10.6028/jres.065A.050.
- North AD, Fairchild MD 1993. Measuring color‐matching functions. Part II. New data for assessing observer metamerism. Color Res Appl 18(3):163–170. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/col.5080180306.
- Prota G, Hu DN, Vincensi MR, McCormick SA, Napolitano A 1998. Characterization of melanins in human irides and cultured uveal melanocytes from eyes of different colors. Exp Eye Res 67(3):293–299. doi:https://doi.org/10.1006/exer.1998.0518.
- Rich DC, Jalijali J 1995. Effects of observer metamerism in the determination of human color-matching functions. Color Res Appl 20(1):29–35. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/col.5080200106.
- Sarkar A 2011a. Final report for R1-54: variability in color-matching functions.
- Sarkar A 2011b. Identification and assignment of colorimetric observer categories and their applications in colorand vision sciences. Thesis. Université de Nantes. Nantes, France. https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-00647246.
- Sarkar A, Autrusseau F, Viénot F, Le Callet P, Blondé L 2011. From CIE 2006 physiological model to improved age-dependent and average colorimetric observers. J Opt Soc Am A 28(10):2033. doi:https://doi.org/10.1364/josaa.28.002033.
- Sarkar A, Blondé L, Le Callet P, Autrusseau F, Morvan P, Stauder J 2010a. Toward reducing observer metamerism in industrial applications: colorimetric observer categories and observer classification. In: 18th Color and Imaging Conference. Texas. USA. (Vol. 2010, No. 1, pp. 307–313). Society for Imaging Science and Technology.
- Sarkar A, Blondé L, Le Callet P, Autrusseau F, Morvan P, Stauder J 2010b. A color matching experiment using two displays: design considerations and pilot test results. In Conference on Colour in Graphics, Imaging, and Vision. Joensuu, Finland. (Vol. 2010, No. 1, pp. 414–422). Society for Imaging Science and Technology.
- Sarkar A, Blondé L, Le Callet P, Autrusseau F, Stauder J, Morvan P. 2009b. Study of observer variability on modern display colorimetry: comparison of CIE 2006 model and 10° standard observer. In: The 11th Congress of the International Colour Association (AIC). Sydney, Australia: AIC.
- Sarkar A, Blondé L, Le Callet P, Autrusseau F, Stauder J, Morvan P 2009a. Study of observer variability in modern display colorimetry:an analysis of CIE 2006 model. In: The 11th Congress of the InternationalColour Association (AIC). Sydney, Australia: AIC.
- Shapiro AG, Pokorny J, Smith VC 1994. Rod contribution to large‐field color matching. Color Res Appl 19(4):236–245. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/col.5080190404.
- Shaw M, Fairchild M 2002. Evaluating the 1931 CIE color-matching functions. Color Res Appl 27(5):316–329. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/col.10077.
- Shi C, Huang M, Liu Y, Li Z, Liu H 2016. Study on Observers’ Categories Based on Color Matching Experiments. In: China Academic Conference on Printing & Packaging and Media Technology (pp. 123-129). Springer, Singapore.
- Smet KAG, Deconinck G, Hanselaer P 2014. Chromaticity of unique white in object mode. Opt Express 22(21):25830–25841. doi:https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.22.025830.
- Speranskaya NI 1959. Determination of spectrum color coordinates for twenty-seven normal observers. Opt Spectrosc 7:424–428. [accessed 2020 Mar 6]. http://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/10018424674/en/.
- Stiles WS, Burch JM 1955a. Interim report to the commission internationale de l’Eclairage, Zurich, 1955, on the national physical laboratory’s investigation of colour-matching (1955). Opt Acta (Lond) 2(4):168–181. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/713821039.
- Stiles WS, Burch JM 1955b. Interim report to the commission internationale de l’Eclairage, Zurich, 1955, on the national physical laboratory’s investigation of colour- matching (1955). Opt Acta (Lond) 2(4):168–181. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/713821039.
- Stiles WS, Burch JM 1959. N.P.L. Colour-matching investigation: final report (1958). Opt Acta Int J Opt 6(1):1–26. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/713826267.
- Stockman A, Sharpe LT 2000. The spectral sensitivities of the middle- and long-wavelength-sensitive cones derived from measurements in observers of known genotype. Vision Res 40(13):1711–1737. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0042-6989(00)00021-3.
- Takahama K, Sobagaki H, Nayatani Y 1985. Prediction of observer variation in estimating colorimetric values. Color Res Appl 10(2):106–117. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/col.5080100209.
- Thornton WA 1992. Toward a more accurate and extensible colorimetry. Part I. Introduction. the visual colorimeter-spectroradiometer. Experimental results. Color Res Appl 17(2):79–122. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/col.5080170208.
- Thornton WA 1997. Toward a more accurate and extensible colorimetry. Part IV. visual experiments with bright fields and both 10° and 1.3° field sizes William. Color Res Appl 22(3):189–198. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6378(199706)22:3<89::aid-col7>3.0.CO;2-N.
- Wielgus AR, Sarna T 2005. Melanin in human irides of different color and age of donors. Pigment Cell Res 18(6):454–464. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0749.2005.00268.x.
- Wright WD 1929. A re-determination of the trichromatic coefficients of the spectral colours. Trans Opt Soc 30(4):141–164. doi:https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-4878/30/4/301.
- Wyszecki G., Stiles WS. 1982. Color science: concepts and methods, quantitative data and formulae. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley.