1,663
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Article

The role of bullying-related policies: Understanding how school staff respond to bullying situations

, , &
Pages 880-895 | Received 04 Jun 2020, Accepted 05 Feb 2021, Published online: 25 Feb 2021
 

ABSTRACT

This study examined school staff reported behavioural responses to bullying, general likelihood of intervening and perceived self-efficacy for intervening with student bullying. We explored if the existence of school bullying-related policies and/or policy trainings was associated with the ways in which school staff responded to bullying. Data came from 8,668 school staff from 156 elementary, middle and high schools in the U.S. Results suggested that while the existence of anti-bullying policies was an important contributor to increased staff self-efficacy for intervening with bullying, it was not associated with self-reports of increased responses to bullying. However, being trained on their schools’ anti-bullying policy was associated with higher odds of intervening with the involved students, discussing the incident with other school staff (e.g., administrators, counsellors), and referring the students involved to the school counsellor/psychologist. Moreover, there were clear role and grade level differences in staff responses, such as being less likely to respond to bullying in high school, as compared to middle and elementary school. The results suggested that the existence of a school policy is not likely sufficient to shift behaviour. Additional training and professional development are necessary across all school staff, especially in upper grades.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Funding

The research reported here was supported by the Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education, through Grant R305H150027 (PI: C. Bradshaw) and the National Institute of Justice (2014-CK-BX-0005) to the University of Virginia. The writing of the manuscript was supported by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD; 1R01HD094833-01A1). The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not represent views of either the Institute, the U.S. Department of Education or NICHD. The data that support the findings of this study are available from C.P. Bradshaw, upon reasonable request.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 301.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.