Publication Cover
Applicable Analysis
An International Journal
Volume 100, 2021 - Issue 13
819
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Discontinuous Galerkin isogeometric analysis for segmentations generating overlapping regions

&
Pages 2749-2776 | Received 20 Dec 2018, Accepted 30 Oct 2019, Published online: 06 Dec 2019

Figures & data

Figure 1. (a) A conforming multipatch representation of Ω, (b) the inaccurate control points and the non-conforming multipatch representation of Ω.

Figure 1. (a) A conforming multipatch representation of Ω, (b) the inaccurate control points and the non-conforming multipatch representation of Ω.

Figure 2. (a) Illustration of a patch representation with the overlapping region Ωo21 in 2d and the diametrically opposite points on Ωo21, (b) overlapping patches in 3d, (c) the images of the faces of Ωˆ under the mappings Φi,i=1,2 in 2d, (d) the images of the faces of Ωˆ in 3d.

Figure 2. (a) Illustration of a patch representation with the overlapping region Ωo21 in 2d and the diametrically opposite points on ∂Ωo21, (b) overlapping patches in 3d, (c) the images of the faces of ∂Ωˆ under the mappings Φi∗,i=1,2 in 2d, (d) the images of the faces of ∂Ωˆ in 3d.

Figure 3. (a) Configuration of the faces and the edges on Ωo12 and their corresponding edges on Ωˆ which are used to compute the interface integrals, (b) an example of an overlapping region with more than two faces. The relative edges on the opposite faces must again match.

Figure 3. (a) Configuration of the faces and the edges on ∂Ωo12 and their corresponding edges on ∂Ωˆ which are used to compute the interface integrals, (b) an example of an overlapping region with more than two faces. The relative edges on the opposite faces must again match.

Table 1. The values of the expected rates r as they result from estimate (Equation63).

Figure 4. Example 4.1: (a) The patches Ωi with the initial non-matching meshes and the contours of the exact solution. (b) The contours of the uh solution for do=h. (c) The convergence rates for the different values of λ.

Figure 4. Example 4.1: (a) The patches Ωi∗ with the initial non-matching meshes and the contours of the exact solution. (b) The contours of the uh∗ solution for do=h. (c) The convergence rates for the different values of λ.

Figure 5. Example 4.2: (a) The overlapping patches Ωi and the pattern of diffusion coefficients ρi, (b) The contours of uh on every Ωi computed with d0=0.06, (c) The convergence rates for the four choices of λ.

Figure 5. Example 4.2: (a) The overlapping patches Ωi∗ and the pattern of diffusion coefficients ρi, (b) The contours of uh∗ on every Ωi computed with d0=0.06, (c) The convergence rates for the four choices of λ.

Figure 6. Example 4.3: (a) The overlapping patches Ωi and the multiple curve boundary of the overlapping region, (b) The contours of uh on every Ωi computed on the second mesh level, (c) The convergence rates for the four choices of λ.

Figure 6. Example 4.3: (a) The overlapping patches Ωi∗ and the multiple curve boundary of the overlapping region, (b) The contours of uh∗ on every Ωi computed on the second mesh level, (c) The convergence rates for the four choices of λ.

Figure 7. Example 4, ΩR3: (a) The physical patches with an initial coarse mesh and the contours of the exact solution, (b) The contours of uh computed on Ω1Ω2 with do=1.5, (c) Convergence rates r for the four values of λ.

Figure 7. Example 4, Ω⊂R3: (a) The physical patches with an initial coarse mesh and the contours of the exact solution, (b) The contours of uh∗ computed on Ω1∗∪Ω2∗ with do=1.5, (c) Convergence rates r for the four values of λ.