Discontinuous Galerkin isogeometric analysis for segmentations generating overlapping regions

References

• Hughes TJR, Cottrell JA, Bazilevs Y. Isogeometric analysis: CAD, finite elements, NURBS, exact geometry and mesh refinement. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 2005;194:4135–4195. doi: 10.1016/j.cma.2004.10.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cotrell JA, Hughes TJR, Bazilevs Y. Isogeometric analysis, toward integration of CAD and FEA. Sussex: John Wiley and Sons; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• da Veiga Beirão L, Buffa A, Sangalli G, et al. Mathematical analysis of variational isogeometric methods. Acta Numer. 2014 May;23:157–287. doi: 10.1017/S096249291400004X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumaker LL. Spline functions: basic theory. Cambridge: University Press; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Bazilevs Y, da Veiga Beirão L, Cottrell JA, et al. Isogeometric analysis: approximation, stability and error estimates for h-refined meshes. Math Models Meth Appl Sci. 2006;16(7):1031–1090. doi: 10.1142/S0218202506001455
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langer U, Toulopoulos I. Analysis of multipatch discontinuous Galerkin IgA approximations to elliptic boundary value problems. Comput Vis Sci. 2016;17(5):217–233. doi: 10.1007/s00791-016-0262-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tagliabue A, Dedé L, Quarteroni A. Isogeometric analysis and error estimates for high order partial differential equations in fluid dynamics. Comput Fluids. 2014;102:277–303. doi: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2014.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoschek J, Lasser D. Fundamentals of computet aided geometric design. Schumaker L, translator; Peters AK, editor. Wellesley (MA): AK Peters Ltd; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Jüttler B, Kapl M, Nguyen D-M, et al. Isogeometric segmentation: the case of contractible solids without non-convex edges. Comput-Aided Des. 2014;57:74–90. doi: 10.1016/j.cad.2014.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pauley M, Nguyen D-M, Mayer D, et al. The isogeometric segmentation pipeline. In: Jüttler B, Simeon B, editors. Isogeometric analysis and applications IGAA 2014. Heidelberg: Springer; 2015. (Lecture notes in computer science; vol. 107).
   Google Scholar
• Xu G, Mourrain B, Duvigneau R, et al. Analysis-suitable volume parameterization of multi-block computational domain in isogeometric applications. Comput-Aided Des. 2013;45(2):395–404. doi: 10.1016/j.cad.2012.10.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu G, Mourrain B, Duvigneau R, et al. Constructing analysis-suitable parameterization of computational domain from cad boundary by variational harmonic method. J Comput Phys. 2013;252(Supplement C):275–289. doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2013.06.029
   Google Scholar
• Buchegger F, Jüttler B. Planar multi-patch domain parameterization via patch adjacency graphs. Comput-Aided Design. 2017;82:2–12. doi: 10.1016/j.cad.2016.05.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falini A, Špeh J, Jüttler B. Planar domain parameterization with THB-splines. Comput Aided Geom Des. 2015;35–36:95–108. doi: 10.1016/j.cagd.2015.03.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Speleers H, Manni C. Optimizing domain parameterization in isogeometric analysis based on powell-sabin splines. J Comput Appl Math. 2015;289:68–86. doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2015.03.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu G, Li M, Mourrain B, et al. Constructing IgA-suitable planar parameterization from complex cad boundary by domain partition and global/local optimization. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 2018;328(Supplement C):175–200. doi: 10.1016/j.cma.2017.08.052
   Google Scholar
• Engvall L, Evans JA. Isogeometric triangular Bernstein–Bézier discretizations: automatic mesh generation and geometrically exact finite element analysis. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 2016;304:378–407. doi: 10.1016/j.cma.2016.02.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xia S, Qian X. Generating high-quality high-order parameterization for isogeometric analysis on triangulations. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 2018;338:1–26. doi: 10.1016/j.cma.2018.04.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen D-M, Pauley M, Jüttler B. Isogeometric segmentation. Part II: on the segmentability of contractible solids with non-convex edges. Graph Models. 2014;76:426–439. doi: 10.1016/j.gmod.2014.03.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen D-M, Pauley M, Jüttler B. Isogeometric segmentation: construction of auxiliarly curves. Comput-Aided Design. 2016;70:89–99. doi: 10.1016/j.cad.2015.06.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bazilevs Y, Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE. Computational fluid – structure interaction, methods and applications. West Sussex: John Wiley and Sons, Ltd; 2013. (Wiley series in computational mechanics.).
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen VP, Kerfriden P, Brino M, et al. Nitsche's method for two and three dimensional NURBS patch coupling. Comput Mech. 2014;53(6):1163–1182. doi: 10.1007/s00466-013-0955-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofer C, Langer U, Toulopoulos I. Discontinuous Galerkin isogeometric analysis of elliptic diffusion problems on segmentations with gaps. SIAM J Sci Comput. 2016;38:A3430–A3460. doi: 10.1137/15M1048574
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofer C, Toulopoulos I. Discontinuous Galerkin isogeometric analysis of elliptic problems on segmentations with non-matching interfaces. Comput Math Appl. 2016;72(7):1811–1827. doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2016.07.039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofer C, Langer U, Toulopoulos I. Discontinuous Galerkin isogeometric analysis on non-matching segmentation: error estimates and efficient solvers. J Appl Math Comput. 2019;61:1–40. doi: 10.1007/s12190-019-01252-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apostolatos A, Schmidt R, Wüchner R, et al. A Nitsche-type formulation and comparison of the most common domain decomposition methods in isogeometric analysis. Int J Numer Meth Eng. 2014;97:473–504. doi: 10.1002/nme.4568
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bazilevs Y, Hughes TJR. Weak imposition of Dirichlet boundary conditions in fluid mechanics. Comput Fluids. 2007;36(1):12–26. doi: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2005.07.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruess M, Schillinger D, Özcan AI, et al. Weak coupling for isogeometric analysis of non-matching and trimmed multi-patch geometries. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 2014;269(0):46–71. doi: 10.1016/j.cma.2013.10.009
   Google Scholar
• Zhang H, Mo R, Wan N. An IgA discontinuous Galerkin method on the union of overlapped patches. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 2017;326:446–480. doi: 10.1016/j.cma.2017.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans LC. Partial differential equations. 1st ed. Providence: American Mathematical Society; 1998. (Graduate studies in mathematics; vol. 19).
   Google Scholar
• De-Boor C. A practical guide to splines. 2nd ed. New York: Springer; 2001. (Applied math. science; vol. 27).
   Google Scholar
• Wriggers P. Nonlinear finite element methods. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Kargaran S, Jüttler B, Kleiss SK, et al. Overlapping multi-patch structures in isogeometric analysis. Linz: Johannes Kepler University, Applied Geometry; 2019. (NFN-technical report No. 87). Available from: http://www.gs.jku.at/pubs/NFNreport87.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Seiler A, Jüttler B. Reparameterization and adaptive quadrature for the isogeometric discontinuous Galerkin method. 9th International Conference Mathematical Methods for Curves and Surfaces; MMCS 2016; Tønsberg, Norway, 2017. p. 251–269.
   Google Scholar
• Hofer C, Langer U. Dual-primal isogeometric tearing and interconnecting solvers for multipatch dG-IgA equations. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 2017;316:2–21. doi: 10.1016/j.cma.2016.03.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mantzaflaris A, Hofer C, Takacs S. G+SMO (Geometry plus simulation modules) v0.8.1; 2015. Available from: http://gs.jku.at/gismo
   Google Scholar
• Jüttler B, Langer U, Mantzaflaris A, et al. Geometry + simulation modules: implementing isogeometric analysis. PAMM. 2014;14(1):961–962. doi: 10.1002/pamm.201410461
   Google Scholar
• Langer U, Mantzaflaris A, Moore St. E, et al. Multipatch discontinuous Galerkin Isogeometric analysis. Heidelberg: Springer International; 2015. p. 1–32. (Lecture notes in computational science and engineering; vol. 107).
   Google Scholar
• Riviere B. Discontinuous Galerkin methods for solving elliptic and parabolic equations. Philadelphia: SIAM; 2008. (Society for industrial and applied mathematics).
   Google Scholar
• Hofer C. Analysis of discontinuous Galerkin dual-primal isogeometric tearing and interconnecting methods. Math Models Methods Appl Sci. 2018;28(01):131–158. doi: 10.1142/S0218202518500045
   Google Scholar
• Hofer C. Parallelization of continuous and discontinuous Galerkin dual-primal isogeometric tearing and interconnecting methods. Comput Math Appl. 2017;74(7):1607–1625. doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2017.06.051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar