Figures & data
Table 1. Experiment initial conditions.
Table 2. Similar experimental data in JSR.
Figure 1. The oxidation of methane in a JSR at atmospheric pressure and φ = 0.3 and 1. Upper panel compares experimental (symbols) and simulation (blue line shows the steady-state solution, and the filled pattern shows oscillation range and variation). The lower panel shows a dynamic simulation of the cases at the starting point of oscillation. Data of T3 is from Ref. (El Bakali et al., Citation2004); T4 and T5 are from Ref. (Le Cong et al., Citation2008).
![Figure 1. The oxidation of methane in a JSR at atmospheric pressure and φ = 0.3 and 1. Upper panel compares experimental (symbols) and simulation (blue line shows the steady-state solution, and the filled pattern shows oscillation range and variation). The lower panel shows a dynamic simulation of the cases at the starting point of oscillation. Data of T3 is from Ref. (El Bakali et al., Citation2004); T4 and T5 are from Ref. (Le Cong et al., Citation2008).](/cms/asset/0387dac6-c49d-4862-b279-5a4c0ee5577a/gcst_a_1452411_f0001_oc.jpg)
Figure 2. Methane oxidation in a JSR at P = 1.1 atm, τ = 0.5 s, and φ = 1 diluted with 90% of N2. Oscillation ranges are highlighted with the filled pattern.
![Figure 2. Methane oxidation in a JSR at P = 1.1 atm, τ = 0.5 s, and φ = 1 diluted with 90% of N2. Oscillation ranges are highlighted with the filled pattern.](/cms/asset/ed3274df-2dc7-4814-a1be-b1b9b99fa726/gcst_a_1452411_f0002_oc.jpg)
Figure 3. Range of temperature oscillations (ΔT = T-Tin) and CH4 conversion versus inlet temperature, for the different dilution systems.
![Figure 3. Range of temperature oscillations (ΔT = T-Tin) and CH4 conversion versus inlet temperature, for the different dilution systems.](/cms/asset/7856b412-704d-4c2d-b342-cde6e03215a7/gcst_a_1452411_f0003_oc.jpg)
Figure 4. Temperature and CH4 profiles at 1185 K, in CO2 diluted system. Temperature and methane profile close to the peak temperature (right panel).
![Figure 4. Temperature and CH4 profiles at 1185 K, in CO2 diluted system. Temperature and methane profile close to the peak temperature (right panel).](/cms/asset/d849780f-da63-4fa5-a25c-bb8f5e180e47/gcst_a_1452411_f0004_oc.jpg)
Figure 5. Sensitivity analysis of methane concentration in the CO2 diluted system and Tin = 1185 K (points A, B and C are shown in ).
![Figure 5. Sensitivity analysis of methane concentration in the CO2 diluted system and Tin = 1185 K (points A, B and C are shown in Figure 4).](/cms/asset/86f19f7f-8d8c-4718-bbe2-f9e5c5124db5/gcst_a_1452411_f0005_oc.jpg)
Figure 8. Oscillations of temperature and CH4 concentration in CO2 diluted systems. Tin = 1140 K (black line); Tin = 1185 K (dotted-dashed line); Tin = 1245 K (red line).
![Figure 8. Oscillations of temperature and CH4 concentration in CO2 diluted systems. Tin = 1140 K (black line); Tin = 1185 K (dotted-dashed line); Tin = 1245 K (red line).](/cms/asset/2518b22f-3754-4223-a5cc-59af0724afd8/gcst_a_1452411_f0008_oc.jpg)
Figure 9. Oscillations of temperature and CH4 concentration in N2, CO2, and (N2+H2O) diluted systems. CO2 (black lines); N2 (dotted-dashed lines); N2+H2O (red lines).
![Figure 9. Oscillations of temperature and CH4 concentration in N2, CO2, and (N2+H2O) diluted systems. CO2 (black lines); N2 (dotted-dashed lines); N2+H2O (red lines).](/cms/asset/b421aa34-2909-485b-8185-2b22739b3762/gcst_a_1452411_f0009_oc.jpg)
Figure 10. Comparison between cyclic oscillations in N2+H2O (red lines) and CO2 diluted systems (black lines). C2H6, CH3, and OH concentration profiles.
![Figure 10. Comparison between cyclic oscillations in N2+H2O (red lines) and CO2 diluted systems (black lines). C2H6, CH3, and OH concentration profiles.](/cms/asset/8dcc4e27-5c70-4ac3-8831-e82caca01886/gcst_a_1452411_f0010_oc.jpg)