The process of processing: exploring the validity of Neisser's perceptual cycle model with accounts from critical decision-making in the cockpit

Abstract

The perceptual cycle model (PCM) has been widely applied in ergonomics research in domains including road, rail and aviation. The PCM assumes that information processing occurs in a cyclical manner drawing on top-down and bottom-up influences to produce perceptual exploration and actions. However, the validity of the model has not been addressed. This paper explores the construct validity of the PCM in the context of aeronautical decision-making. The critical decision method was used to interview 20 helicopter pilots about critical decision-making. The data were qualitatively analysed using an established coding scheme, and composite PCMs for incident phases were constructed. It was found that the PCM provided a mutually exclusive and exhaustive classification of the information-processing cycles for dealing with critical incidents. However, a counter-cycle was also discovered which has been attributed to skill-based behaviour, characteristic of experts. The practical applications and future research questions are discussed.

Practitioner Summary: This paper explores whether information processing, when dealing with critical incidents, occurs in the manner anticipated by the perceptual cycle model. In addition to the traditional processing cycle, a reciprocal counter-cycle was found. This research can be utilised by those who use the model as an accident analysis framework.

Keywords::

• critical decision method
• perceptual cycle model
• schema theory
• aeronautical decision-making
• qualitative analysis
• validity

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the 20 helicopter pilots who gave their time to participate in our interviews and the reviewers who enhanced the quality of the paper.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).