The process of processing: exploring the validity of Neisser's perceptual cycle model with accounts from critical decision-making in the cockpit

References

• Annett, J.2002. “A Note of the Validity and Reliability of Ergonomics Methods.” Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science3 (2): 228–232.
   Google Scholar
• Bartlett, F. C.1932. Remembering: A Study of Experimental and Social Psychology. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boyatzis, R. E.1998. Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology3 (2): 77–101.
   Google Scholar
• Burla, L., B. Knierim, J. Barth, K. Liewald, M. Duetz, and T. Abel. 2008. “From Text to Codings. Intercoder Reliability Assessment in Qualitative Content Analysis.” Nursing Research57 (2): 113–117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Civil Aviation Authority. 2010. UK Airline Statistics: 2010 – Annual. London: CAA.
   Google Scholar
• Crandall, B., and K. Gretchell-Reiter. 1993. “Critical Decision Method: A Technique for Eliciting Concrete Assessment Indicators from the Intuition of NICU Nurses.” Advances in Nursing Science16: 42–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crandall, B., G. A. Klein, and R. R. Hoffman. 2006. Working minds: A Practitioner's Guide to Cognitive Task Analysis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dekker, S. W. A.2011. “What is Rational About Killing a Patient with An Overdose? Enlightenment, Continental Philosophy and the Role of the Human Subject in System Failure.” Ergonomics54 (8): 679–683.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drivalou, S., and N. Marmaras. 2009. “Supporting Skill-, Rule-, and Knowledge-Based Behaviour through An Ecological Interface: An Industry-Scale Application.” International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics39: 947–965.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Aviation Safety Agency. 2012. “Annual Safety Review 2012.” . Accessed October 21, 2004. http://easa.europa.eu/system/files/dfu/EASA-Annual-Safety-Review-2012.pdf. ISBN: 978-92-9210-182-4.
   Google Scholar
• Henley, I., P. Anderson, and M. Wiggins. 1999. “Integrating Human Factors Education in General Aviation: Issues and Teaching Strategies.” In Human Performance in General Aviation, edited by D. O'Hare, 89–117. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Hobbs, A., and A. Williamson. 2002. “Skills, Rules, and Knowledge in Aircraft Maintenance: Errors in Context.” Ergonomics45 (4): 290–308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollnagel, E.2001. “Extended cognition and the future of Ergonomics.” Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science2 (3): 309–315.
   Google Scholar
• Hollnagel, E., and D. D. Woods. 1983. “Cognitive Systems Engineering: New Wine in New Bottles.” International Journal of Man Machine Studies18: 583–600.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, G. A., and A. Armstrong. 2005. “Critical Decision Method.” In Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics Methods, edited by N. A. Stanton, A. Hedge, K. Brookhuis, E. Salas, and H. Hendrick, 35.1–35.8. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, G. A.1999. Sources of Power: How People Make Decisions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, G. A., R. Calderwood, and D. Macgregor. 1989. “Critical Decision Method for Eliciting Knowledge.” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics19 (3): 462–472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lombard, M., J. Snyder-Duch, and C. C. Bracken. 2002. “Content Analysis in Mass Communication. Assessment and Reporting of Intercoder Reliability.” Human Communication Research28 (4): 587–604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marques, J. F., and C. McCall. 2005. “The Application of Inter-Rater Reliability as a Solidification Instrument in a Phenomenological Study.” The Qualitative Report10 (3): 439–462.
   Google Scholar
• Maurino, D. E.2000. “Human Factors and Aviation Safety: What the Industry Has, What the Industry Needs.” Ergonomics43 (7): 952–959.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neissen, C., K. Eyeferth, and T. Bierwagen. 1999. “Modelling Cognitive Processes of Experienced Air Traffic Controllers.” Ergonomics42 (11): 1507–1520.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neisser, U.1976. Cognition and Reality. San Francisco: W.H. Freemand and Co.
   Google Scholar
• Norman, D. A.1981. “Categorisation of Action Slips.” Psychological Review88: 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Hare. 1992. “The Artful Decision Maker: A Framework Model for Aeronautical Decision Making.” The International Journal of Aviation Psychology2 (3): 175–191.
   Google Scholar
• O'Hare, D., N. Mullen, and A. Arnold. 2010. “Enhancing Aeronautical Decision Making Through Case-Based Reflection.” The International Journal of Aviation Psychology20 (1): 48–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Hare, D., M. Wiggins, A. Williams, and W. Wong. 1998. “Cognitive Task Analyses for Decision Centred Design and Training.” Ergonomics41 (11): 1698–1718.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plant, K. L., and N. A. Stanton. 2014. “All For One and One For All: Representing Teams As A Collection of Individuals and An Individual Collective Using A Network Perceptual Cycle Approach.” International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics44: 777–792.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plant, K. L., and N. A. Stanton. 2012b. “‘I Did Something Against All Regulations’: Decision Making in Critical Incidents.” In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics, 21–25th July 2012, San Francisco, America. Conference book: Advances in Human Aspects of Aviation (2012), edited by S Landry. CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Plant, K. L., and N. A. Stanton. 2013a. “The Explanatory Power of Schema Theory: Theoretical Foundations and Future Applications in Ergonomics.” Ergonomics56 (1): 1–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plant, K. L., and N. A. Stanton. 2013b. “What's on Your Mind? Using the Perceptual Cycle Model and Critical Decision Method to Understand the Decision-Making Process in the Cockpit.” Ergonomics56 (8): 1232–1250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plant, K. L., and N. A. Stanton. 2012a. “Why Did the Pilots Shut Down the Wrong Engine? Explaining Errors in Context Using Schema Theory and the Perceptual Cycle Model.” Safety Science50: 300–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, J.1983. “Skills, Rules, and Knowledge; Signals, Signs, and Symbols, and Other Distinctions in Human Performance Models.” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics13 (3): 257–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, J.1974. The Human Data Processor as A System Component: Bits and pieces of a model (Report No. RisØ-M-1722). Roskilde, Denmark: Danish Atomic Energy Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Reason, J.1990. Human Error. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Revell, K., and N. A. Stanton. 2012. “Models of Models: Filtering and Bias Rings in Depiction of Knowledge Structure and Their Implications for Design.” Ergonomics55 (9): 1073–1092.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robson, C.2002. Real World Research. A Resource for Social Scientists and Practitioner-Researchers. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Salmon, P. M., M. G. Lenne, G. H. Walker, N. A. Stanton, and A. Filtness. 2014. “Exploring Schema-Driven Differences in Situation Awareness between Road Users: An On-Road Study of Driver, Cyclist and Motorcyclist Situation Awareness.” Ergonomics57 (2): 191–209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmon, P. M., G. J. M. Read, N. A. Stanton, and M. G. Lenne. 2013. “The Crash at Kerang: Investigating Systemic and Psychological Factors Leading to Unintentional Non-Compliance at Rail Level Crossings.” Accident Analysis and Prevention50: 1278–1288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmon, P. M., N. A. Stanton, G. H. Walker, C. Baber, D. P. Jenkins, R. McMaster, and M. S. Young. 2008a. “What Really is Going On? Review of Situation Awareness Models for Individuals and Teams.” Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science9 (4): 297–323.
   Google Scholar
• Salmon, P. M., N. A. Stanton, G. H. Walker, and D. P. Jenkins. 2009a. Distributed Situation Awareness. Theory Measurement and Application to Teamwork. Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Salmon, P. M., N. A. Stanton, G. H. Walker, D. Jenkins, C. Baber, and R. McMaster. 2008b. “Representing Situation Awareness in Collaborative Systems: A Case Study in the Energy Distribution Domain.” Ergonomics51 (3): 367–384.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmon, P. M., N. A. Stanton, G. H. Walker, D. Jenkins, D. Ladva, L. Rafferty, and M. Young. 2009b. “Measuring Situation Awareness in Complex Systems: Comparison of Measures Study.” International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics39: 490–500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A.1957. Models of Man: Social and Rational; Mathematical Essays On Rational Human Behaviour in a Social Setting. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A.1959. “Theories of Decision Making in Economics and Behavioural Science.” The American Economics Review49 (3): 253–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, K., and P. A. Hancock. 1995. “Situation Awareness is Adaptive, Externally Directed Consciousness.” Human Factors37 (1): 137–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanton, N. A.2002. “Guest Editorial: Developing and Validating Theory in Ergonomics Science.” Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science3 (2): 111–114.
   Google Scholar
• Stanton, N. A., P. R. G. Chambers, and J. Piggott. 2001. “Situation Awareness and Safety.” Safety Science39: 189–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanton, N.A., P. M. Salmon, L. A. Rafferty, G. H. Walker, C. Baber, and D. P. Jenkins. 2013. Human Factors Methods: A Practical Guide for Engineering and Design. 2nd ed.Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Stanton, N. A., P. M. Salmon, G. H. Walker, and D. Jenkins. 2009. “Genotype and Phenotype Schemata and Their Role in Distributed Situation Awareness in Collaborative Systems.” Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science10 (1): 43–68.
   Google Scholar
• Stanton, N. A., R. Stewart, D. Harris, R. J. Houghton, C. Baber, R. McMaster, P. Salmon, G. Hoyle, G. Walker, M. Young, M. Linsell, R. Dymott, and D. Green. 2006. “Distributed Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems: Theoretical Development and Application of An Ergonomics Methodology.” Ergonomics49 (12): 1288–1311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanton, N. A., and G. H. Walker. 2011. “Exploring the Psychological Factors Involved in the Ladbroke Grove Rail accident.” Accident Analysis and Prevention43 (3): 1117–1127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanton, N. A., and M. S. Young. 1998. “Is Utility in The mond of the Beholder? A Study of Ergonomics Methods.” Applied Ergonomics29 (1): 41–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanton, N. A., and M. S. Young. 1999. “What Price Ergonomics?” Nature399: 197–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., and J. Corbin. 1990. Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, W., P. Sallis, and D. O'Hare. 1997. “Eliciting Information Portrayal Requirements: Experiences with the Critical Decision Method.”. The Information Science Discussion Paper Series, 97/041–16.
   Google Scholar