Abstract:
The industrial development in sub-Saharan Africa is perhaps more affected by the quality of institutions than that of other regions. We investigate what alternatives managers may have and what their firms would need to function in case the institutional furniture they encounter is of low quality. We find that, in high quality institutional environments, management spending effort to deal with the authorities and to navigate regulations negates the effect of the institutional environment. Managers do not need to spend such efforts. Perhaps surprisingly, we find that the positive effect of high-quality institutional environments on firm performance is enhanced by making informal payments.
Notes
1 On the difference between gifts and bribes, see Susan Rose-Ackerman (Citation1998). For a review of the literature on gift exchange, see Wilfred Dolfsma, Rene Van der Eijk, and Albert Jolink (Citation2009).
Additional information
Notes on contributors
Gori Olusina Daniel
Goriola Olusina Daniel is a doctoral researcher, Kun Fu is a lecturer in entrepreneurship and innovation, and Wilfred Dolfsma is a professor of innovation and entrepreneurship, all at Loughborough University.
Kun Fu
Goriola Olusina Daniel is a doctoral researcher, Kun Fu is a lecturer in entrepreneurship and innovation, and Wilfred Dolfsma is a professor of innovation and entrepreneurship, all at Loughborough University.
Wilfred Dolfsma
Goriola Olusina Daniel is a doctoral researcher, Kun Fu is a lecturer in entrepreneurship and innovation, and Wilfred Dolfsma is a professor of innovation and entrepreneurship, all at Loughborough University.