612
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Article

Numerical simulation and experimental research on CHF characteristics of AP1000 nuclear reactor

, , , &
Pages 1412-1424 | Received 30 Apr 2018, Accepted 12 Aug 2018, Published online: 08 Sep 2018

Figures & data

Figure 1. AP1000 loop layout.

Figure 1. AP1000 loop layout.

Figure 2. Geometric parameters of AP1000 RV outer profile, mm.

Figure 2. Geometric parameters of AP1000 RV outer profile, mm.

Figure 3. Views of the calculation domain mesh.

Figure 3. Views of the calculation domain mesh.

Table 1. Constants value in k-ε model

Table 2. Physical property parameter and boundary condition

Figure 4. Flow distribution on reactor vertical section. (a) Velocity distribution, m/s (b) Ttmperature distribution, K.

Figure 4. Flow distribution on reactor vertical section. (a) Velocity distribution, m/s (b) Ttmperature distribution, K.

Figure 5. Velocity distribution of reactor core, m/s. (a) Lower grid plate inlet section (b) upper grid plate outlet section.

Figure 5. Velocity distribution of reactor core, m/s. (a) Lower grid plate inlet section (b) upper grid plate outlet section.

Figure 6. Flow distribution of loop fault. (a) Velocity distribution, m/s (b) temperature distribution, K.

Figure 6. Flow distribution of loop fault. (a) Velocity distribution, m/s (b) temperature distribution, K.

Figure 7. Velocity distribution at the lower grid plate inlet section of loop fault, m/s.

Figure 7. Velocity distribution at the lower grid plate inlet section of loop fault, m/s.

Figure 8. Flow distribution of annular channel blocking accident (a) Velocity distribution, m/s (b) temperature distribution, K.

Figure 8. Flow distribution of annular channel blocking accident (a) Velocity distribution, m/s (b) temperature distribution, K.

Figure 9. Comparison of CHF and DNBR between AP1000 reactor and CPR1000 reactor. (a) AP1000 reactor (b) CPR1000 reactor.

Figure 9. Comparison of CHF and DNBR between AP1000 reactor and CPR1000 reactor. (a) AP1000 reactor (b) CPR1000 reactor.

Table 3. Main design parameters of AP1000 and CPR1000 reactor

Figure 10. Comparison of AP1000 and CPR1000 rod bundles channel test. (a) Temperature rise trends of AP1000 (b) temperature rise trends of CPR1000.

Figure 10. Comparison of AP1000 and CPR1000 rod bundles channel test. (a) Temperature rise trends of AP1000 (b) temperature rise trends of CPR1000.

Figure 11. Distribution of the (a) neutron fluence rate and (b) reactor core temperature on CPR1000.

Figure 11. Distribution of the (a) neutron fluence rate and (b) reactor core temperature on CPR1000.

Figure 12. Reactor core outlet temperature field distribution.

Figure 12. Reactor core outlet temperature field distribution.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.