1,597
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Screening for Potential, Assessing for Achievement: A Study of Instrument Validity for Early Identification of High Academic Potential in Norway

ORCID Icon, &
Pages 574-590 | Received 05 Jul 2021, Accepted 08 Feb 2022, Published online: 22 Feb 2022

Figures & data

Figure 1. Relationship between R2, true and false positives, and true and false negatives.

Figure 1. Relationship between R2, true and false positives, and true and false negatives.

Figure 2. The interpretation/use argument for identifying children with high academic potential.

Figure 2. The interpretation/use argument for identifying children with high academic potential.

Table 1. Descriptive statistics, cases.

Table 2. Questionnaire items retained in the teacher and parent scales.

Table 3. Models regressing kindergarten academic achievement on each academic potential scale.

Table 4. Kindergarten screening, 1.28 SD cut-off.

Table 5. Kindergarten screening, 0.67 SD cut-off.

Table 6. Models regressing 8th grade academic achievement on each academic potential scale.

Table 7. 8th grade sensitivity and OCC of screening, 1.28 SD and 0.67 SD cut-offs.

Figure 3. High academic potential and academic achievement, by gender and mother's education.

Figure 3. High academic potential and academic achievement, by gender and mother's education.