6,422
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLES

Beneficial or Harmful? How (Mis)Fit of Targeted Political Advertising on Social Media Shapes Voter Perceptions

Pages 19-35 | Received 28 Jan 2022, Accepted 11 Jan 2023, Published online: 23 Mar 2023

Figures & data

Table 1. Results of the structural equation model controlling for autoregressive relationships.

Figure 1. Model showing the relationships between the perceived fit and misfit of targeted political advertising (TPA) on perceived manipulative intent and perceived benefits and harms for democracy. N = 428. The paths were estimated applying robust maximum likelihood estimation. Robust fit indices are reported: χ2 (617) = 857.83, p < .001, CFI = .97, TLI = .96, RMSEA = .03, SRMR = .05. Political interest, political distrust, political ideology, age, gender, education, online behavioral advertising (OBA) knowledge, and privacy concerns served as control variables. Dotted lines show autoregressive relationships. W1 = Wave 1; W2 = Wave 2. *p < .05; **p < .01; ***p < .001.

Figure 1. Model showing the relationships between the perceived fit and misfit of targeted political advertising (TPA) on perceived manipulative intent and perceived benefits and harms for democracy. N = 428. The paths were estimated applying robust maximum likelihood estimation. Robust fit indices are reported: χ2 (617) = 857.83, p < .001, CFI = .97, TLI = .96, RMSEA = .03, SRMR = .05. Political interest, political distrust, political ideology, age, gender, education, online behavioral advertising (OBA) knowledge, and privacy concerns served as control variables. Dotted lines show autoregressive relationships. W1 = Wave 1; W2 = Wave 2. *p < .05; **p < .01; ***p < .001.
Supplemental material

Supplemental Online Appendices

Download MS Word (46.5 KB)