Figures & data
Table 1. Participants and participating schools/university.
Figure 3. The conceptual structure of student attitudes towards languages. Note: T: teachers; S: students.
![Figure 3. The conceptual structure of student attitudes towards languages. Note: T: teachers; S: students.](/cms/asset/f8c04135-2c89-4cc4-aed3-54e4fd1cc478/rmmm_a_2137516_f0003_ob.jpg)
Figure 5. Attitude towards Putonghua: Factor structure and factor loadings (Whole sample: N = 5,237).
![Figure 5. Attitude towards Putonghua: Factor structure and factor loadings (Whole sample: N = 5,237).](/cms/asset/f8fab62a-6c13-48d5-aa39-68775a9d0e64/rmmm_a_2137516_f0005_ob.jpg)
Figure 7. Attitudes towards ethnic languages: Factor structure and factor loadings (Ethnic minority participants: N = 3,410).
![Figure 7. Attitudes towards ethnic languages: Factor structure and factor loadings (Ethnic minority participants: N = 3,410).](/cms/asset/45b43a3b-f4d0-492a-b319-3dd980121c86/rmmm_a_2137516_f0007_ob.jpg)
Table 2. Goodness-of-Fit Indices for the three-factor model of language attitudes.
Table 3. Correlation between items and total scales.
Table 4. Convergent validity of the Language Attitudes Scale-Student Form in relation to different languages.
Table 5. Cronbach’s Alphas of Scales and Subscales (N = 5,237).
Table 6. Correlations between language attitudes and self-perceived language proficiency (r ).
Table 7. Correlations between language attitudes and real achievement in languages (r).