Abstract
Educational research is increasingly turning to conceptual frameworks from a range of disciplines in order to enrich understandings of education, pedagogy and learning. This paper draws on the work of Henri Lefebvre, specifically rhythmanalysis, to explore the nature and the function of pedagogy. The context is an ethnographic study of parenting education and pedagogic practices in a child and family service in Sydney. Three features of rhythmanalysis are discussed: kinds of rhythm, rhythms and bodies, and oppositions such as repetition and difference, fast and slow and secret and public. Through these concepts, intricate connections between rhythm and pedagogy are identified, including rhythms as providing a pedagogic imperative, rhythms as content and mechanisms at the heart of pedagogy and rhythms as outcomes of learning. The paper argues that rhythmanalysis opens up possibilities for new questions, different kinds of empirical sensibilities and distinctive accounts of pedagogy and learning in continuing education.
Acknowledgements
I wish to thank: all participating parents and children who kindly let me share in their journeys of change; the staff of the Unit for opening their working lives to me; Jane Kohlhoff for her support throughout the study; Teena Clerke for valuable research assistance; Cathrine Fowler for bringing me into the world of child and family health services; and Alison Lee, sadly missed, whose contribution cannot be measured in words. The study was funded by the University of Technology, Sydney.