Figures & data
Table 1. Example instruments items concerning prejudice.
Table 2. Demographic characteristics.
Figure 1. Interaction of group and time for prejudice toward people living with mental illness.
Note: N = 126. Figure zoomed in to show trend.
![Figure 1. Interaction of group and time for prejudice toward people living with mental illness.Note: N = 126. Figure zoomed in to show trend.](/cms/asset/b6b45fbd-f2ca-4eca-b626-e8792cfa0dcb/imhn_a_2346593_f0001_c.jpg)
Figure 2. Interaction of group and time for prejudice toward people living with depression.
Note: N = 126. Figure zoomed in to show trend.
![Figure 2. Interaction of group and time for prejudice toward people living with depression.Note: N = 126. Figure zoomed in to show trend.](/cms/asset/cf326bcd-884f-478b-86f3-153423466d3c/imhn_a_2346593_f0002_c.jpg)
Figure 3. Interaction of group and time for prejudice toward people living with schizophrenia.
Note: N = 126. Figure zoomed in to show trend.
![Figure 3. Interaction of group and time for prejudice toward people living with schizophrenia.Note: N = 126. Figure zoomed in to show trend.](/cms/asset/885d06a7-cd2d-4762-b452-3e986a3379c3/imhn_a_2346593_f0003_c.jpg)
Table 3. Two-way mixed ANOVAs for prejudice toward people living with general mental illness, depression, or schizophrenia: Total scores.
Table 4. Summary of subscale results.