6,148
Views
22
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Participation in adult education and training in countries with high and low participation rates: demand and barriers

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

Figures & data

Figure 1. Participation rate in adult education and training (AET) by country. The whole population and working population. European countries1 participating in the 2013 PIAAC survey.

1Country abbreviations: FI= Finland, DK=Denmark, NL= the Netherlands, SE= Sweden, NO= Norway, UK=United Kingdom, IE=Ireland, EE= Estonia, CZ=Czech Republic, DE=Germany, BE=Belgium, ES=Spain, PL= Poland, SK=Slovak Republic, FR= France

Figure 1. Participation rate in adult education and training (AET) by country. The whole population and working population. European countries1 participating in the 2013 PIAAC survey.1Country abbreviations: FI= Finland, DK=Denmark, NL= the Netherlands, SE= Sweden, NO= Norway, UK=United Kingdom, IE=Ireland, EE= Estonia, CZ=Czech Republic, DE=Germany, BE=Belgium, ES=Spain, PL= Poland, SK=Slovak Republic, FR= France

Table 1. Four groups of demand for AET by own educational level in European countries with high and low AET participation rate.

Table 2. Logistic regression on being in the ‘partially met demand’-group. Separate analyses for countries with high and low AET participation rate.

Figure 2. Four types of demand for AET, by country2. Eight countries participating in the 2013 PIAAC survey.

2Country abbreviations: NO= Norway, DK=Denmark, FI= Finland, SE= Sweden, NL= the Netherlands, FR= France, Pl= Poland, SK=Slovak republic

Figure 2. Four types of demand for AET, by country2. Eight countries participating in the 2013 PIAAC survey.2Country abbreviations: NO= Norway, DK=Denmark, FI= Finland, SE= Sweden, NL= the Netherlands, FR= France, Pl= Poland, SK=Slovak republic

Figure 3. Estimated probability of being in the ‘partially met demand’ group in European countries with high and low participation rate, by various background characteristics. Calculations based on significant coefficients in the regression in .

Figure 3. Estimated probability of being in the ‘partially met demand’ group in European countries with high and low participation rate, by various background characteristics. Calculations based on significant coefficients in the regression in Table 2.

Table 3. Average frequency of barriers to AET participation in European countries with high and low participation rate.