696
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Sports Medicine and Biomechanics

Rate of loading, but not lower limb kinematics or muscle activity, is moderated by limb and aerial variation when surfers land aerials

ORCID Icon, , , , , & show all
Pages 1780-1788 | Accepted 01 Mar 2021, Published online: 28 Mar 2021
 

ABSTRACT

We aimed to determine whether there were any differences in how surfers used their lead and trail limbs when landing two variations of a simulated aerial manoeuvre, and whether technique affected the forces generated at landing. Fifteen competitive surfers (age 20.3 ± 5.6 years, height 178.2 ± 9.16 cm, mass 71.0 ± 10.5 kg) performed a Frontside Air (FA) and Frontside Air Reverse (FAR), while we collected the impact forces, ankle and knee muscle activity, and kinematic data. A principal component analysis (PCA) was used to reduce 41 dependent variables into 10 components. A two-way MANOVA revealed that although there were no limb x aerial variation interactions, surfers generated significantly higher relative loading rates at landing for the trail limb compared to the lead limb (+28.8 BW/s; F(1,303) = 20.660, p < 0.0001, η2 = 0.064). This was likely due to the surfers “slapping” the trail limb down when landing, rather than controlling placement of the limb. Similarly, higher relative loading rates were generated when landing the FA compared to the FAR (+23.6 BW/s; F(1,303) = 31.655, p < 0.0001, η2 = 0.095), due to less time over which the forces could be dissipated. No relationships between aerial variation or limb were found for any of the kinematic or muscle activity data. Practitioners should consider the higher relative loading rates generated by a surfer’s trail limb and when surfers perform a FA when designing dry-land training to improve the aerial performance of surfing athletes.

Acknowledgments

Mr Forsyth was supported by an Australian Research Training Program Scholarship when undertaking this research. The authors would like to thank Dr Jonathan Shemmell for his help interpreting the electromyography data.

Disclosure statement

James R. Forsyth, Christopher J. Richards, Ming-Chang Tsai, John W. Whitting, Diane L. Riddiford-Harland, Jeremy M. Sheppard and Julie R. Steele declare that they have no conflicts of interest relevant to the content of this review.

Supplementary material

Supplemental data for this article can be accessed online https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2021.1898167.

Notes

1 In some occasions, more than five trials were collected to ensure that the participant’s feet were in contact with the surfboard before landing. These trials were included in the analysis because there was no expectation that a single trial would substantially influence the outcome of any statistical testing.

Additional information

Funding

No funding was received in support of this study.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 461.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.