Figures & data
FIG. 1 3-D views of the oral airway model and bifurcation airway model (generations G0 to G3). B1—first bifurcation, B2.1 and B2.2—second bifurcation, B3.1, B3.2, B3.3, and B3.4—third bifurcation (the dashed lines indicate the segmental boundaries).
![FIG. 1 3-D views of the oral airway model and bifurcation airway model (generations G0 to G3). B1—first bifurcation, B2.1 and B2.2—second bifurcation, B3.1, B3.2, B3.3, and B3.4—third bifurcation (the dashed lines indicate the segmental boundaries).](/cms/asset/10ec26b8-395f-420e-a1ee-91d0b42da500/uast_a_146098_o_146098f0001.gif)
FIG. 2 Comparison of diameter and temperature evolution for a water droplet with the experimental data of CitationSmolik et al. (2001).
![FIG. 2 Comparison of diameter and temperature evolution for a water droplet with the experimental data of CitationSmolik et al. (2001).](/cms/asset/59b65ab9-ce54-4f03-a0c6-824be8069108/uast_a_146098_o_146098f0002.gif)
FIG. 3 Mean air temperatures in the present simulation compared with experimental values of CitationMcFadden et al. (1985) and calculated results of CitationDaviskas et al. (1990) with Tin = 26.7°C and Qin = 30 l/min.
![FIG. 3 Mean air temperatures in the present simulation compared with experimental values of CitationMcFadden et al. (1985) and calculated results of CitationDaviskas et al. (1990) with Tin = 26.7°C and Qin = 30 l/min.](/cms/asset/649595e2-1340-487e-aa29-da134d0eb889/uast_a_146098_o_146098f0003.gif)
FIG. 4 Variations of cross-sectional averaged relative humidity with Qin = 30 l/min in: (a) the oral airway model; and (b) the bifurcation airway model G0–G3.
![FIG. 4 Variations of cross-sectional averaged relative humidity with Qin = 30 l/min in: (a) the oral airway model; and (b) the bifurcation airway model G0–G3.](/cms/asset/0cc71f1a-e633-45d4-8ab8-d30c46d44ff0/uast_a_146098_o_146098f0004.gif)
FIG. 5 Effects of inlet relative humidity and air temperature on the mass transfer coefficient of water vapor (Qin = 30 l/min).
![FIG. 5 Effects of inlet relative humidity and air temperature on the mass transfer coefficient of water vapor (Qin = 30 l/min).](/cms/asset/ba32ff6d-c2c5-4453-846b-62b25de99574/uast_a_146098_o_146098f0005.gif)
FIG. 6 Regional Sherwood number (Sh) versus the product of Re and Sc for the human upper airway model.
![FIG. 6 Regional Sherwood number (Sh) versus the product of Re and Sc for the human upper airway model.](/cms/asset/17ce458c-ae17-4f8e-8e31-7ad737d9f761/uast_a_146098_o_146098f0006.gif)
FIG. 7 Variations of evaporation rate of isotonic saline droplets in the oral airway model under different inhalation conditions: Influence of (a) inhalation flow rate; (b) inlet RH and high Tin; and (c) inlet RH and low Tin.
![FIG. 7 Variations of evaporation rate of isotonic saline droplets in the oral airway model under different inhalation conditions: Influence of (a) inhalation flow rate; (b) inlet RH and high Tin; and (c) inlet RH and low Tin.](/cms/asset/235735f8-5afa-4f15-9403-372434c0ce5c/uast_a_146098_o_146098f0007.gif)
FIG. 8 Trajectories and diameter evolution of selected isotonic saline droplets in the oral airway model with Qin = 30 l/min, Tin = 303 K and RHin = 60%.
![FIG. 8 Trajectories and diameter evolution of selected isotonic saline droplets in the oral airway model with Qin = 30 l/min, Tin = 303 K and RHin = 60%.](/cms/asset/26e48a4d-26db-4e6a-bba9-9900e4ccdbbf/uast_a_146098_o_146098f0008.jpg)
FIG. 9 Evaporation rate of isotonic saline droplets in the bifurcation airway model G0-G3 under different inhalation conditions: Influence of (a) inlet RH, initial particle size and high Tin; and (b) initial particle size and inlet air temperature.
![FIG. 9 Evaporation rate of isotonic saline droplets in the bifurcation airway model G0-G3 under different inhalation conditions: Influence of (a) inlet RH, initial particle size and high Tin; and (b) initial particle size and inlet air temperature.](/cms/asset/6470452b-ca75-417c-8fa1-c96c7c334da1/uast_a_146098_o_146098f0009.gif)
FIG. 10 Cumulative distribution of isotonic saline droplet sizes at the inlet of the bifurcation airway model: Influence of (a) inhalation flow rate; (b) inlet RH and high Tin; and (c) inlet RH and low Tin.
![FIG. 10 Cumulative distribution of isotonic saline droplet sizes at the inlet of the bifurcation airway model: Influence of (a) inhalation flow rate; (b) inlet RH and high Tin; and (c) inlet RH and low Tin.](/cms/asset/8a83aeb8-4033-4eaa-a0ee-5c850b8c1cd0/uast_a_146098_o_146098f0010.gif)
FIG. 11 3-D distributions of deposition enhancement factor (DEF) in the oral airway model for micro-size isotonic saline droplets.
![FIG. 11 3-D distributions of deposition enhancement factor (DEF) in the oral airway model for micro-size isotonic saline droplets.](/cms/asset/9322c286-17a4-4788-8e72-0387cc01cbef/uast_a_146098_o_146098f0011.jpg)
FIG. 12 3-D distributions of deposition enhancement factor (DEF) in the airways G0 to G3 for micro-size isotonic saline droplets.
![FIG. 12 3-D distributions of deposition enhancement factor (DEF) in the airways G0 to G3 for micro-size isotonic saline droplets.](/cms/asset/170dfe6e-d0ed-469a-8fd2-615ea84cb2bf/uast_a_146098_o_146098f0012.jpg)