Figures & data
TABLE 1 Physical characteristics of tested portable microbial samplers
FIG. 1 Relative performance of portable impactors as a function of sampling time, t S , when sampling bacteria indoors. The data represent averages and standard deviations from nine repeats.
![FIG. 1 Relative performance of portable impactors as a function of sampling time, t S , when sampling bacteria indoors. The data represent averages and standard deviations from nine repeats.](/cms/asset/653662e5-7cb5-4660-834c-6b4e20629609/uast_a_439215_o_f0001g.gif)
FIG. 2 Relative performance of portable impactors as a function of sampling time, t S , when sampling fungi indoors. The data represent averages and standard deviations from nine repeats.
![FIG. 2 Relative performance of portable impactors as a function of sampling time, t S , when sampling fungi indoors. The data represent averages and standard deviations from nine repeats.](/cms/asset/886ac588-3756-444c-982e-887d672e207c/uast_a_439215_o_f0002g.gif)
FIG. 3 Relative performance of portable impactors as a function of sampling time, t S , when sampling bacteria outdoors. The test samplers sampled outdoor air for t COLL = 2 min and then sampled particle-free air for t S −t COLL , where t S = 2, 5, 10, and 30 min. The data represent averages and standard deviations from nine repeats.
![FIG. 3 Relative performance of portable impactors as a function of sampling time, t S , when sampling bacteria outdoors. The test samplers sampled outdoor air for t COLL = 2 min and then sampled particle-free air for t S −t COLL , where t S = 2, 5, 10, and 30 min. The data represent averages and standard deviations from nine repeats.](/cms/asset/4c63fdd4-7325-4b47-a69d-d0d5500a9433/uast_a_439215_o_f0003g.gif)
FIG. 4 Relative performance of portable impactors as a function of sampling time, t S , when sampling fungi outdoors. The test samplers sampled outdoor air for t COLL = 2 min and then sampled particle-free air for t S −t COLL , where t S = 2, 5, 10, and 30 min. The data represent averages and standard deviations from nine repeats.
![FIG. 4 Relative performance of portable impactors as a function of sampling time, t S , when sampling fungi outdoors. The test samplers sampled outdoor air for t COLL = 2 min and then sampled particle-free air for t S −t COLL , where t S = 2, 5, 10, and 30 min. The data represent averages and standard deviations from nine repeats.](/cms/asset/22ca4c7d-52c5-44a2-a40d-28a030aba03d/uast_a_439215_o_f0004g.gif)
FIG. 5 Relative performance of portable impactors as a function of sampling time, t S , when sampling bacteria outdoors. The test samplers sampled particle-free air for t S − 2 min (t S = 2, 5, 10, and 30 min) and then sampled outdoor air for t COLL = 2 min. The data represent averages and standard deviations from nine repeats.
![FIG. 5 Relative performance of portable impactors as a function of sampling time, t S , when sampling bacteria outdoors. The test samplers sampled particle-free air for t S − 2 min (t S = 2, 5, 10, and 30 min) and then sampled outdoor air for t COLL = 2 min. The data represent averages and standard deviations from nine repeats.](/cms/asset/e557c67b-4959-4e4d-8e07-5d10d58b637e/uast_a_439215_o_f0005g.gif)
FIG. 6 Relative performance of portable impactors as a function of sampling time, t S , when sampling fungi outdoors. The test samplers sampled particle-free air for t S − 2 min (t S = 2, 5, 10, and 30 min) and then sampled outdoor air for t COLL = 2 min. The data represent averages and standard deviations from nine repeats.
![FIG. 6 Relative performance of portable impactors as a function of sampling time, t S , when sampling fungi outdoors. The test samplers sampled particle-free air for t S − 2 min (t S = 2, 5, 10, and 30 min) and then sampled outdoor air for t COLL = 2 min. The data represent averages and standard deviations from nine repeats.](/cms/asset/34d7807d-3ca8-447b-a6bb-825df1d61ebf/uast_a_439215_o_f0006g.gif)