Figures & data
Figure 4. Velocity contours in the square channel at Re = 1.12 and Kn = 0.032. (a) z/(HRe) D 0.087; (b) z/(HRe) D 0.217; (c) z/(HRe) D 0.304.
![Figure 4. Velocity contours in the square channel at Re = 1.12 and Kn = 0.032. (a) z/(HRe) D 0.087; (b) z/(HRe) D 0.217; (c) z/(HRe) D 0.304.](/cms/asset/4c2a55e8-74e8-4a75-acad-ead9cd8e8cbf/uast_a_1218437_f0004_b.gif)
Table 1. Simulation parameters.
Figure 7. Comparison of computational results obtained in this article and experimental results reported in Wu et al. (Citation2013).
![Figure 7. Comparison of computational results obtained in this article and experimental results reported in Wu et al. (Citation2013).](/cms/asset/1e323637-07a0-4bed-9c37-446bcb53d97b/uast_a_1218437_f0007_oc.gif)
Figure 8. The effects of the Knudsen number and Stokes numbers on capture efficiency (a) without the electrostatic force and (b) with the electrostatic force.
![Figure 8. The effects of the Knudsen number and Stokes numbers on capture efficiency (a) without the electrostatic force and (b) with the electrostatic force.](/cms/asset/1d94cae6-6d5a-439b-8902-e55d89b037f8/uast_a_1218437_f0008_oc.gif)
Figure 9. The effects of the length of the channel on capture efficiency (a) without the electrostatic force and (b) with the electrostatic force.
![Figure 9. The effects of the length of the channel on capture efficiency (a) without the electrostatic force and (b) with the electrostatic force.](/cms/asset/b7cec826-7bdd-4575-a45f-fe8772c58730/uast_a_1218437_f0009_oc.gif)