2,989
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Exploring shifts in the characteristics of US government-funded science curriculum materials and their (unintended) consequences

, , &

Figures & data

Figure 1. Theoretical model underpinning this study.

Figure 1. Theoretical model underpinning this study.

Table 1. Inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Table 2. Overview of search and selection process by funding organisation.

Table 3. Coding scheme for format of curriculum materials.

Table 4. Coding scheme for scope.

Table 5. Coding scheme for supports for student learning.

Table 6. Coding scheme for supports for teaching.

Table 7. Proportion of projects per time period, χ2, p-values, and Cramer’s V for award start period effects on each variable.

Figure 2. Major shifts in key characteristics of grant-funded science curriculum materials.

Figure 2. Major shifts in key characteristics of grant-funded science curriculum materials.

Table 8. Exp b (i.e., odds ratio) from logistic regression analyses of award start period along with other key characteristics: prediction of presence of student information or conceptual background in the teachers’ materials, and public availability or access to professional development (PD) after the award is over.