Erasures and equivalences: negotiating the politics of culture in the OECD’s global competence project

Figures & data

Figure 1. NTA of OECD global competence reports.

Table 1. Comparison of semantic difference and overlap between OECD’s 2016 and 2018 global competence reports. The table includes only terms with a minimum in-degree of 5.

	GCIW – 2016	OVERLAP	PYISW – 2018
Global Competence	dimension(s), order, complex, societies, systems, relationships, scale, UNESCO, curriculum, mindedness, challenging, teaching	OECD, future	education, development, international, national, opportunities, local, professional, understanding, PISA, sustainable, goals, outcomes, data, engage, measure, integrate, youth, capacity, challenges, citizenship, resources, Singapore, values, climate, economic, environment, language, science
Students	learning, development, assessment, PISA, cognitive, schools, languages, teachers, behaviours, awareness, outcomes, questionnaire, test	learning	learning, work, countries, studying, perspectives, skills, community, knowledge, understand, history, ideas, communities, experiences, identify, organisations, communicate, problems, vision, attitudes, authentic, interactions, multicultural
People	difference, world, education, communication, perspectives, countries, ability, language, work, difference, young, contexts, flexibility, build, interact	young	young
Knowledge	understanding, skills, intercultural, issues, critical, capacity, information, behaviour, international, opportunities, empathy, encounters, interactions, meanings, mobilise		–
Culture	values, attitude, diversity, individuals, beliefs, important, multiple, respect, openness, dignity, human, responsibility, context, school, background, communities, person, sensitivity		–

Table 2. Comparison of betweenness-centrality.

Table 3. Comparing the global semantic galaxy.