602
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

High prevalence and variable fitness of fluoroquinolone-resistant avian pathogenic Escherichia coli isolated from chickens in Korea

, , , , , & show all
Pages 151-160 | Received 09 Apr 2020, Accepted 20 Nov 2020, Published online: 03 Feb 2021

Figures & data

Figure 1. Antimicrobial resistance of 286 APEC isolates collected from clinical cases between 2014 and 2018. The isolates showed the highest resistance against nalidixic acid (98.0%), followed by ampicillin (71.7%), tetracycline (69.9%), sulfisoxazole (61.2%), enrofloxacin (60.1%), and ciprofloxacin (54.9%). Abbreviations: ampicillin, AMP; amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, AMC; cephalothin, CEF; cefoxitin, FOX; ceftiofur, XNL; cefepime, FEP; apramycin, APR; gentamicin, GEN; streptomycin, STR; neomycin, NEO; tetracycline, TET; nalidixic acid, NAL; enrofloxacin, ENR; ciprofloxacin, CIP; trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole, SXT; sulfisoxazole, FIS; chloramphenicol, CHL; florfenicol, FFC.

Figure 1. Antimicrobial resistance of 286 APEC isolates collected from clinical cases between 2014 and 2018. The isolates showed the highest resistance against nalidixic acid (98.0%), followed by ampicillin (71.7%), tetracycline (69.9%), sulfisoxazole (61.2%), enrofloxacin (60.1%), and ciprofloxacin (54.9%). Abbreviations: ampicillin, AMP; amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, AMC; cephalothin, CEF; cefoxitin, FOX; ceftiofur, XNL; cefepime, FEP; apramycin, APR; gentamicin, GEN; streptomycin, STR; neomycin, NEO; tetracycline, TET; nalidixic acid, NAL; enrofloxacin, ENR; ciprofloxacin, CIP; trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole, SXT; sulfisoxazole, FIS; chloramphenicol, CHL; florfenicol, FFC.

Table 1. The MIC distribution of quinolones against 132 isolates of fluoroquinolone-resistant APEC.

Table 2. Mutations in gyrA, parC, and parE of 132 isolates of fluoroquinolone-resistant APEC.

Table 3. The distribution of quinolone MICs and mutations in gyrA, parC, and parE of nine APEC isolates harbouring the PMQR gene qnrS1.

Table 4. Antimicrobial resistance patterns and virulence-associated gene contents of representative fluoroquinolone-resistant isolates of APEC used in biofilm formation and intramacrophage survival assays.

Figure 2. Biofilm formation of fluoroquinolone-resistant and pansusceptible isolates of APEC. Each isolate was tested by a crystal violet assay using polystyrene microtitre plates with LB broth. Bars show averaged biofilm levels from two independent experiments and error bars represent standard errors. Although isolates of mutant groups C and F formed relatively robust biofilms 24 h post-incubation compared with the pansusceptible isolate (*P < 0.05), overall, their biofilm levels were low, and there was no significant difference between fluoroquinolone-resistant and pansusceptible isolates.

Figure 2. Biofilm formation of fluoroquinolone-resistant and pansusceptible isolates of APEC. Each isolate was tested by a crystal violet assay using polystyrene microtitre plates with LB broth. Bars show averaged biofilm levels from two independent experiments and error bars represent standard errors. Although isolates of mutant groups C and F formed relatively robust biofilms 24 h post-incubation compared with the pansusceptible isolate (*P < 0.05), overall, their biofilm levels were low, and there was no significant difference between fluoroquinolone-resistant and pansusceptible isolates.

Figure 3. Intramacrophage survival of fluoroquinolone-resistant and pansusceptible isolates of APEC in the chicken macrophage cell line HD11. Bars represent the ratio (%) of intracellular bacteria to inoculated bacteria that was determined based on three independent experiments, and error bars indicate standard errors. The isolates were able to survive in the HD11 cells with variation, but there was no significant difference in intracellular survival between fluoroquinolone-resistant and pansusceptible isolates.

Figure 3. Intramacrophage survival of fluoroquinolone-resistant and pansusceptible isolates of APEC in the chicken macrophage cell line HD11. Bars represent the ratio (%) of intracellular bacteria to inoculated bacteria that was determined based on three independent experiments, and error bars indicate standard errors. The isolates were able to survive in the HD11 cells with variation, but there was no significant difference in intracellular survival between fluoroquinolone-resistant and pansusceptible isolates.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.