Publication Cover
Maritime Policy & Management
The flagship journal of international shipping and port research
Volume 43, 2016 - Issue 2
1,460
Views
22
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

The impact of Panama Canal expansion on the container-shipping market: a cooperative game theory approach

, &
Pages 209-221 | Published online: 04 Mar 2016
 

Abstract

Complicated relationships and interactions among stakeholders in the international container-shipping market make it difficult to estimate the impact of the market’s structural changes. This article uses cooperative game theory to analyze potential impacts of the Panama Canal (PC) expansion on the evolving competitive–cooperative relationships and the distribution of market power among the supply-chain players in the US container-import market. The hierarchical structure of the ocean shipping industry is captured using bi-level optimization models, with the ocean carrier (OC) acting as the market leader. The result shows that the enlarged ship size passing through the PC will increase the East Coast players’ market power by 32% while hurting the West Coast players by 22%. The subcoalition between the OC and the West Coast players is most likely to form prior to the PC expansion while the subcoalition between the OC and the East Coast players is preferred by the OC after the PC expansion. However, the total profit with competitive subcoalitions is always less than the grand coalition’s profit. The impacts of possible variations in service costs, as well as charges by the PC, the ports, and the railroad after the expansion, are also analyzed.

Acknowledgments

The corresponding author would also like to give special thanks to Upper Great Plains Transportation Institute for funding support during her PhD study. This article is a revised and expanded version of a paper entitled ‘The Impact of Panama Canal Expansion on U.S. Container Import Market Structure: A Game Theory Approach’ presented at International Association of Maritime Economist, Norfolk, USA, 2014.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported partly by the General Research Fund of Hong Kong Research Grant Council [PolyU 5463/12H]; the National Natural Science Foundation of China [71471101]; and the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province, China [ZR2015GZ008].

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 743.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.