The impact of Panama Canal expansion on the container-shipping market: a cooperative game theory approach

References

• Anderson, C., Y.-A. Park, Y.-T. Chang, C.-H. Yang, T.-W. Lee, and M. Luo. 2008. “A Game Theoretic Analysis of Competition Among Container Port Hubs: The Case of Busan and Shanghai.” Maritime Policy & Management 35 (1): 5–26. doi:10.1080/03088830701848680.
   Google Scholar
• Aumann, R. J., and L. S. Shapley. 1974. Values of Non-Atomic Games. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, M. 1993. “International Competitiveness: Assessing and Exploring Competitive Advantage by Ocean Container Carriers.” Logistics and Transportation Review 29: 278–293.
   Google Scholar
• de Marucci, S. 2012. “The Expansion of the Panama Canal and Its Impact on Global CO2 Emissions from Ships.” Maritime Policy & Management 39 (6): 603–620. doi:10.1080/03088839.2012.733069.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan, L. 2010. “Optimization Model and Risk Analysis for Global Supply Chain in Container Shipments: Imports to the United States.” PhD diss., North Dakota State University.
   Google Scholar
• Fan, L., W. Wilson, and B. Dahl. 2012. “Impacts of New Routes and Ports on Spatial Competition for Containerized Imports into the United States.” Maritime Policy & Management 39 (5): 479–501. doi:10.1080/03088839.2012.705027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan, L., W. Wilson, and B. Dahl. 2015. “Risk Analysis in Port Competition for Containerized Imports.” European Journal of Operational Research 245 (3): 743–753. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2015.03.051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franc, P., and M. Van der Horst. 2010. “Understanding Hinterland Service Integration by Shipping Lines and Terminal Operators: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis.” Journal of Transport Geography 18 (4): 557–566. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2010.03.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurley, W. J., and E. R. Petersen. 1994. “Nonlinear Tariffs and Freight Network Equilibrium.” Transportation Science 28: 236–245. doi:10.1287/trsc.28.3.236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishii, M., P. T.-W. Lee, K. Tezuka, and Y.-T. Chang. 2013. “A Game Theoretical Analysis of Port Competition.” Transportation Research Part E 49 (1): 92–106. doi:10.1016/j.tre.2012.07.007.
   Google Scholar
• Jula, P., and R. C. Leachman. 2011a. “Long- and Short-Run Supply Chain Optimization Models for the Allocation and Congestion Management of Containerized Imports from Asia to the United States.” Transportation Research Part E 47 (5): 593–608. doi:10.1016/j.tre.2011.02.006.
   Google Scholar
• Jula, P., and R. C. Leachman. 2011b. “A Supply-Chain Optimization Model of the Allocation of Containerized Imports from Asia to the United States.” Transportation Research Part E 47 (5): 609–622. doi:10.1016/j.tre.2011.02.007.
   Google Scholar
• Leachman, R. 2010. Final Report-Port and Modal Elasticity Study, Phase II. Piedmont, CA: Leachman & Associates LLC.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, H., M. Boileb, S. Theofanisc, and S. Chooa. 2012. “Modeling the Oligopolistic and Competitive Behavior of Carriers in Maritime Freight Transportation Networks.” Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 54: 1080–1094. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.823.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Q. 2013. “Game Theory Approach to the Vertical Relationships for U.S. Containerized Imports.” PhD diss., North Dakota State University.
   Google Scholar
• Luo, M., L. Fan, and W. W. Wilson. 2014. “Firm Growth and Market Concentration in Ocean Liner Shipping.” Journal of Transport Economics & Policy 48 (1): 171–187.
   Google Scholar
• Myerson, R. B. 1991. Game Theory: Analysis of Conflict. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Notteboom, T. 2006. “Chapter 2 Strategic Challenges to Container Ports in a Changing Market Environment.” Research in Transportation Economics 17: 29–52. doi:10.1016/S0739-8859(06)17002-X.
   Google Scholar
• Pagano, A. M., M. K. Light, O. V. Sánchez, R. Ungo, and E. Tapiero. 2012. “Impact of the Panama Canal Expansion on the Panamanian Economy.” Maritime Policy & Management 39 (7): 705–722. doi:10.1080/03088839.2012.729273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panayides, P. M., and R. Wiedmer. 2011. “Strategic Alliances in Container Liner Shipping.” Research in Transportation Economics 32 (1): 25–38. doi:10.1016/j.retrec.2011.06.008.
   Google Scholar
• Rodrigue, J.-P. 2010. Factors Impacting North American Freight Distribution in View of the Panama Canal Expansion. Calgary, Alberta. Canada: The Van Horne Institute, University of Calgary.
   Google Scholar
• Rodrigue, J.-P., and T. Notteboom. 2011. “The Panama Canal Expansion: Business as Usual or Game Changer.” Port Technology International 51: 10–12.
   Google Scholar
• Shapley, L. S. 1953. “A Value for N-Person Games.” In Contributions to the Theory of Games Volume II, edited by H. W. Kuhn and A. W. Tucker, 307–317. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shiao, G.-C., and -C.-C. Hwang. 2013. “Analyzing Competition of International Air Cargo Carriers in the Asian General Air Cargo Markets.” Transport Policy 27: 164–170. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2013.02.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stackelberg, H. V. 1934. Marktform Und Gleichgewicht. Vienna, Austria: Julius Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ungo, R., and R. Sabonge. 2012. “A Competitive Analysis of Panama Canal Routes.” Maritime Policy & Management 39 (6): 555–570. doi:10.1080/03088839.2012.728727.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wie, B.-W. 1995. “A Differential Game Approach to the Dynamic Mixed Behavior Traffic Network Equilibrium Problem.” European Journal of Operational Research 83 (1): 117–136. doi:10.1016/0377-2217(93)E0242-P.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao, F., and H. Yang. 2007. “Three-Player Game-Theoretic Model over a Freight Transport Network.” Transportation Research Part C 15 (4): 209–217. doi:10.1016/j.trc.2006.08.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar