337
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

The preparation, characterization of Lupeol PEGylated liposome and its functional evaluation in vitro as well as pharmacokinetics in rats

, , , , , , & show all
Pages 1052-1060 | Received 29 Sep 2018, Accepted 07 Jan 2019, Published online: 21 Apr 2019
 

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to enhance the solubility and bioavailability of Lupeol.

Methods: Utilizing a thin-film dispersion method, we prepared Lupeol-loaded PEGylated liposomes and Lupeol-loaded liposomes, which was characterized using SEM, mean diameter, PDI, zeta potential, and entrapment efficiency (EE). The EE, in vitro release, and stability of Lupeol-loaded PEGylated liposomes were detected using HPLC. In addition to the safety evaluation, the evaluation was carried out on HepG2 cells in vitro; the pharmacokinetics were carried out after i.v. in the rats.

Results: The size, PDI, zeta potential, and EE of Lupeol-loaded PEGylated liposomes and Lupeol-loaded liposomes were 126.9 nm, 0.246, −1.97 mV, 87%; 97.23 nm, 0.25, 1.6 mV, 86.2%, respectively. Lupeol-loaded PEGylated liposomes showed the slow-release effect in vitro release experiments. Lupeol-loaded PEGylated liposomes offered significant advantages over other experimental groups in vitro studies, such as the highest inhibition rate and the highest apoptosis rate. We also found that Lupeol-loaded PEGylated liposomes blocked cells in the G2M phase. The pharmacokinetics result showed that the AUC of Lupeol-loaded PEGylated liposomes group was 3.2 times higher than free Lupeol group after i.v., the MRT and t1/2 values of Lupeol-loaded PEGylated liposomes (MRT = 6.09 h, t1/2 =12.94 h) showed improvements of 2.5 and 4.1 times compared to free Lupeol (MRT = 2.43 h, t1/2 = 3.16 h).

Conclusion: The Lupeol-loaded PEGylated liposomes have successfully solved its poor hydrophilicity, low bioavailability.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Funding

This study was financially supported by a grant from the National Science Foundation of China [81602424].

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 1,085.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.