179
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Too few, too many, or just right: Causes and Consequences of Sex Ratio Variation in Crustaceans

Reproductive rhythms, variation in operational sex ratio and sexual selection in crustaceans

, , &
Pages 208-221 | Received 28 Mar 2019, Accepted 02 Jun 2019, Published online: 01 Jul 2019
 

ABSTRACT

Operational sex ratio (OSR) has long been considered an important predictor of sexual selection strength. In crustaceans, OSR is primarily dependent upon reproductive rhythms. Herein, we model different conditions of reproductive rhythms to investigate the potential link between OSR and the strength of sexual selection, focusing on sexual traits commonly found in crustacean males. OSR can vary widely over a reproductive season as a result of reproductive rhythms, which limits the accuracy of its estimation based on a small sample. Overall, OSR was still predicted to correlate positively with sexual selection strength across different reproductive rhythms, yet only when males were assumed to experience a reproductive time-out. A review of experimental and field studies focusing on the link between OSR and sexual selection strength in crustaceans generally confirms our predictions. For the few studies failing to find the predicted pattern, we discuss potential causes for that discrepancy and urge future experimental research to specifically test for the effect of male time-out on the strength of sexual selection for male mating traits. Our model provides new predictions about the link between OSR and sexual selection and revives the long-lasting debate about OSR as an accurate estimate of sexual selection strength.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Christine Ewers-Saucedo for inviting us to submit a manuscript to this issue of the journal. We also generally thank the organizers and participant of the symposium on crustacean sex-ratios which took place during International Crustacean Congress IX. Two anonymous reviewers provided many constructive suggestions that further helped to improve the manuscript. Finally, we thank Thomas Aubier, for constructive discussions about the content of the paper.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Supplementary materials

Supplemental materials data for this article can be accessed here

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 260.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.