Reproductive rhythms, variation in operational sex ratio and sexual selection in crustaceans

References

• Andersson M. 1994. Sexual selection. Princeton (New Jersey): Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bauer RT. 2004. Remarkable Shrimp: adaptations and Natural History of the Carideans. Norman (Oklahoma): University of Oklahoma Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benvenuto C, Knott B, Weeks SC. 2009. Mate-guarding behavior in clam shrimp: a field approach. Behav Ecol. 20:1125–1132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birkhead TR, Clarkson K. 1980. Mate selection and precopulatory guarding in Gammarus pulex. Z Tierpsychol. 52:365–380.
   Google Scholar
• Brockerhoff AM, McLay CL. 2005. Factors influencing the onset and duration of receptivity of female purple rock crabs, Hemigrapsus sexdentatus (H. Milne Edwards, 1837) (Brachyura: grapsidae). J Exp Mar Biol Ecol. 314:123–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christy JH. 1978. Adaptive significance of reproductive cycles in the fiddler crab Uca pugilator: a hypothesis. Science. 199:453–456.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christy JH. 2011. Timing of hatching and release of larvae by brachyuran crabs: patterns, adaptive significance and control. Integr Comp Biol. 51:62–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christy JH, Salmon M. 1984. Ecology and evolution of mating systems of fiddler crabs (genus Uca). Biol Rev. 59:483–509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clutton-Brock TH, Parker GA. 1992. Potential reproductive rates and the operation of sexual selection. Q Rev Biol. 67:437–456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Correa C, Baeza JA, Hinojosa IA, Thiel M. 2003. Male dominance hierarchy and mating tactics in the rock shrimp Rhynchocinetes typus (Decapoda: caridea). J Crustacean Biol. 23:33–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Correa C, Thiel M. 2003a. Mating systems in caridean shrimp (Decapoda: caridea) and their evolutionary consequences for sexual dimorphism and reproductive biology. Rev Chil Hist Nat. 76:187–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Correa C, Thiel M. 2003b. Population structure and operational sex ratio in the rock shrimp Rhynchocinetes typus (Decapoda: caridea). J Crustacean Biol. 23:849–861.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darwin C. 1871. The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. London: Murray; p. 415.
   Google Scholar
• Dennenmoser S, Christy JH, Thiel M. 2019. Rhythms and reproduction. In: Cothran R, Thiel M, editors. Reproductive Biology. Volume VI in the series “The natural History of Crustacea”. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dick JTA, Elwood RW. 1996. Effects of natural variation in sex ratio and habitat structure on mate-guarding decisions in amphipods (Crustacea). Behaviour. 133:985–996.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emlen ST, Oring LW. 1977. Ecology, sexual selection and the evolution of mating systems. Science. 197:215–223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galipaud M, Bollache L, Oughadou A, Dechaume-Moncharmont FX. 2015. Males do not always switch females when presented with a better reproductive option. Behav Ecol. 26:359–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garner S, Neff B. 2019. Alternative Reproductive Tactics. In: Cothran R, Thiel M, editors. Reproductive Biology. Volume VI in the series “The natural History of Crustacea”. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grafen A, Ridley M. 1983. A model of mate guarding. J Theor Biol. 102:549–567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartnoll RG. 1969. Mating in the Brachyura. Crustaceana. 16:161–181.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes CL, Callander S, Booksmythe I, Jennions MD, Backwell PRY. 2016. Mate choice and the operational sex ratio: an experimental test with robotic crabs. J Evol Biol. 29:1455–1461.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iribarne O, Fernandez M, Armstrong D. 1995. Precopulatory guarding-time of the male amphipod Eogammarus oclairi: effect of population structure. Mar Biol. 124:219–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janicke T, Morrow EH. 2018. Operational sex ratio predicts the opportunity and direction of sexual selection across animals. Ecol Lett. 21:384–391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jivoff P, Hines AH. 1998. Female behavior, sexual competition and mate guarding in the blue crab, Callinectes sapidus. Anim Behav. 55:589–603.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jormalainen V. 1998. Precopulatory mate guarding in crustaceans: male competitive strategy and inter-sexual conflict. Q Rev Biol. 73:275–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jormalainen V, Merilaita S, Tuomi J. 1994. Male choice and male-male competition in Idotea baltica (Crustacea, Isopoda). Ethology. 96:46–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendall MS, Wolcott DL, Wolcott TG, Hines AH. 2001. Reproductive potential of individual male blue crabs, Callinectes sapidus, in a fished population: depletion and recovery of sperm number and seminal fluid. Can J Fish Aqu Sci. 58:1168–1177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkpatrick M, Ravigné V. 2002. Speciation by natural and sexual selection: models and experiments. Am Nat. 159:S22–S35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klug H, Heuschele J, Jennions MD, Kokko H. 2010. The mismeasurement of sexual selection. J Evol Biol. 23:447–462.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knowlton N. 1979. Reproductive synchrony, parental investment and the evolutionary dynamics of sexual selection. Anim Behav. 27:1022–1023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kokko H, Klug H, Jennions MD. 2012. Unifying cornerstones of sexual selection: operational sex ratio, Bateman gradient and the scope for competitive investment. Ecol Lett. 15:1340–1351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kvarnemo C, Ahnesjö I. 1996. The dynamics of operational sex ratios and competition for mates. Trends Ecol Evol. 11:404–408.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemaître JF, Rigaud T, Cornet S, Bollache L. 2009. Sperm depletion, male mating behaviour and reproductive “time-out” in Gammarus pulex (Crustacea, Amphipoda). Anim Behav. 77:49–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linsenmair KE. 2007. Sociobiology of terrestrial isopods. In: Duffy JE, Thiel M, editors. Evolutionary ecology of social and sexual systems: crustaceans as model organisms. New York: Oxford University Press; p. 339–364.
   Google Scholar
• Manning JT. 1980. Sex ratio and optimal male time investment strategies in Asellus aquaticus (L.) and A. meridianus Racovitza. Behaviour. 74:264–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martins MJF, Puckett TM, Lockwood R, Swaddle JP, Hunt G. 2018. High male sexual investment as a driver of extinction in fossil ostracods. Nature. 556:366–369.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathews LM. 2002. Tests of the mate-guarding hypothesis for social monogamy: does population density, sex ratio, or female synchrony affect behavior of male snapping shrimp (Alpheus angulatus)? Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 51:426–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minouchi S, Goshima S. 2000. The effect of male size and sex ratio on the duration of precopulatory mate guarding in the hermit crab Pagurus filholi. Benthos Res. 55:37–41.
   Google Scholar
• Moura RR, Peixoto PEC. 2013. The effect of operational sex ratio on the opportunity for sexual selection: a meta-analysis. Anim Behav. 86:675–683.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pardo LM, Riveros MP, Fuentes JP, Pinochet R, Cárdenas C, Sainte-Marie B. 2017. High fishing intensity reduces females’ sperm reserve and brood fecundity in a eubrachyuran crab subject to sex-and size-biased harvest. CES J Mar Sci. 74:2459–2469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pardo LM, Rosas Y, Fuentes JP, Riveros MP, Chaparro OR. 2015. Fishery induces sperm depletion and reduction in male reproductive potential for crab species under male-biased harvest strategy. PLoS One. 10:e0115525.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parnes S, Raviv R, Shechter A, Sagi A. 2006. Males also have their time of the month! Cyclic disposal of old spermatophores, timed by the molt cycle, in a marine shrimp. J Exp Biol. 209:4974–4983.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rondeau A, Sainte-Marie B. 2001. Variable mate-guarding time and sperm allocation by male snow crabs (Chionoecetes opilio) in response to sexual competition, and the impact on the mating success of females. Biol Bull. 201:204–217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sainte-Marie B, Gosselin T, Sevigny JM, Urbani N. 2008. The snow crab mating system: opportunity for natural and unnatural selection in a changing environment. Bull Mar Sci. 83:131–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sato T, Ashidate M, Wada S, Goshima S. 2005. Effects of male mating frequency and male size on ejaculate size and reproductive success of female spiny king crab Paralithodes brevipes. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 296:251–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shuster SM. 1989. Female sexual receptivity associated with molting and differences in copulatory behavior among the three male morphs in Paracerceis sculpta (Crustacea: isopoda). Biol Bull. 177:331–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutcliffe DW. 1992. Reproduction in Gammarus (Crustacea: amphipoda): basic reproductive processes. Freshwater Forum. 2:102–128.
   Google Scholar
• Taborsky M, Oliveira RF, Brockmann HJ. 2008. The evolution of alternative reproductive tactics: concepts and questions. In: Oliveira RF, Taborsky M, Brockmann HJ, editors. Alternative Reproductive Tactics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; p. 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Takeshita F, Henmi Y. 2010. The effects of body size, ownership and sex-ratio on the precopulatory mate guarding of Caprella penantis (Crustacea: amphipoda). J Mar Biol Assoc UK. 90:275–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wada S, Tanaka K, Goshima S. 1999. Precopulatory mate guarding in the hermit crab Pagurus middendorffii (Brandt) (Decapoda: paguridae): effects of population parameters on male guarding duration. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol. 239:289–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waddy SL, Feindel N, Hamilton-Gibson N, Aiken DE, Merritt V, Leavitt N. 2017. Reproductive cycles and mating capacity in male American lobsters (Homarus americanus). Fish Res. 186:358–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward PI. 1983. Advantages and a disadvantage of large size for male Gammarus pulex (Crustacea: amphipoda). Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 14:69–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamamura N. 1987. A model on correlation between precopulatory guarding and short receptivity to copulation. J Theor Biol. 127:171–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar