Abstract
Two computer programs, SSWC (Sundararajan-Schubert Word Count) and LIWC (Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count), were used in combination to analyze the texts of 3 religious writers—one true mystic (Johannes Tauler), one false mystic (Thomas Müntzer) from medieval German Christianity, and one modern “saint,” Mother Teresa (Warren, Citation2010, p. 7). Results suggest that reflections on spiritual suffering that loom large in both medieval German mysticism and Mother Teresa constitute an adaptive approach to negative emotions, so far unexplored. Implications for research on negative religious coping, and adaptive versus maladaptive reflections on negative emotions will be discussed.
Notes
Note. Variables not in bold will not be analyzed due to low baseline.
Note. N = number of paragraphs randomly selected. Min = minimum number of words in a selected passage. Max = maximum number of words in a selected passage.
Note. *, ** and *** represent statistical significance at .05, .01 and .001, respectively. NS = not significant. No need = Pair-wise comparison is not needed due to no significant difference in writing style among all three authors. p 1i, p 2i and p 3i represent the proportions of the ith SSWC variable for Tauler, Müntzer, and Mother Teresa, respectively.
Note. *, ** and *** represent statistical significance at .05, .01 and .001, respectively. NS = not significant. No need = Pair-wise comparison is not needed due to no significant difference in writing style among all three authors. p 1i, p 2i and p 3i represent the proportions of the ith LIWC variable for Tauler, Müntzer, and Mother Teresa, respectively.