281
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Perception of organizational climate by university staff and students in medicine and humanities: A qualitative study

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Received 29 Oct 2022, Accepted 24 Jan 2023, Published online: 09 Feb 2023
 

ABSTRACT

Organizational climate and culture are important for research organizations because they foster research integrity and responsible conduct of research, reduce questionable research practices, and improve job satisfaction. The aim of our study was to explore how employees and students perceive organizational climate and its consequences in the university setting. We conducted semi-structured interviews with senior students and employees (teaching and non-teaching staff) from two different university schools: School of Medicine and Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences. Participants were asked questions regarding perceived climate, working environment, and the role of the institution. The data were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis approach. Three themes were identified. The first theme addressed the difference in the perception and understanding of organizational climate. The second theme dealt with institutional issues emanating from organizational climate. The third theme described the behavior of stakeholders in the formation of organizational climate. Organizational climate is important concept in academic organizations as it influences both employees, particularly early career researchers, and students. Institutional leadership can strongly influence organizational climate, which can in turn affect job and job satisfaction. Due to the importance of personal morality on everyday decision-making, virtue-based research integrity training could be useful in improving academic institutions’ organizational climate.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the participants of the study for their time.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Supplementary data

Supplemental data for this article can be accessed online at https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2023.2173586

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by Croatian Science Foundation, “Young Researchers’ Career Development Project – Training of Doctoral Students”, and by the Croatian Science Foundation, grants “Professionalism in Health Care, ProHealth” grant number IP-2014-09-7672 and “Professionalism in Health– Decision making in practice and research, ProDeM” grant number IP-2019-04-4882. The funder had no role in the design of this study and its execution, analyses, interpretation of the data, or decision to submit results.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 461.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.