Publication Cover
School Effectiveness and School Improvement
An International Journal of Research, Policy and Practice
Volume 30, 2019 - Issue 4
2,552
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Democratization of educational systems, inequality, opportunity, and selection process: a re-examination of the case of France

Pages 432-454 | Received 11 Nov 2017, Accepted 28 Jan 2019, Published online: 22 Mar 2019

Figures & data

Figure 1. Fraction of holders of a baccalaureate degree in a generation (%).

Source: Ministry of National Education.

Figure 1. Fraction of holders of a baccalaureate degree in a generation (%).Source: Ministry of National Education.

Table 1. Classification of educational levels.

Table 2. Inequality of opportunity within selection for access to level LIV education. French, from 25 to 65 years old, sons and daughters of land-owning farmers not included.

Table 3. Inequality of opportunity within selection for access to level LIII education. French, from 25 to 65 years old, sons and daughters of land-owning farmers not included.

Figure 2. Inequality within selection for access to the various percentile ranks of population. French boys, from 25 to 65 years old, sons of land-owning farmers not included.

Source: FQP surveys by INSEE for 1970, 1977, 1985, 1993, 2003.

Note: Curve 1970–1979 shows that inequality of access to the top 85% of the school population is equal to 0.69, while inequality of access to the top 10% is equal to 0.78.

Figure 2. Inequality within selection for access to the various percentile ranks of population. French boys, from 25 to 65 years old, sons of land-owning farmers not included.Source: FQP surveys by INSEE for 1970, 1977, 1985, 1993, 2003.Note: Curve 1970–1979 shows that inequality of access to the top 85% of the school population is equal to 0.69, while inequality of access to the top 10% is equal to 0.78.

Figure 3. Inequality within selection for access to the various percentile ranks of population. French girls, from 25 to 65 years old, daughters of land-owning farmers not included.

Source: FQP Surveys by INSEE for 1970, 1977, 1985, 1993, 2003.

Note: Curve 1970–1979 shows that inequality of access to the top 90% of the school population is equal to 0.59, while inequality of access to the top 10% is equal to 0.66.

Figure 3. Inequality within selection for access to the various percentile ranks of population. French girls, from 25 to 65 years old, daughters of land-owning farmers not included.Source: FQP Surveys by INSEE for 1970, 1977, 1985, 1993, 2003.Note: Curve 1970–1979 shows that inequality of access to the top 90% of the school population is equal to 0.59, while inequality of access to the top 10% is equal to 0.66.

Figure A1. Virtual opportunity distributions.

Figure A1. Virtual opportunity distributions.