Figures & data
Table 1. Student characteristics (only graduates who went to university at some point between 2004 and 2013) in single-sex and coeducational schools: proportions, means, and Cohen’s d.
Table 2. Relative risk ratios of young women choosing a physical science or life science major relative to a non-science major.
Table 3. Relative risk ratios of young men choosing a physical science or life science major relative to a non-science major.
Figure 1. Predicted probabilities of young women enrolling in a physical science or life science major by gender composition of school.
Data: LSAY 2003.
Note: The predicted probabilities are based on the multinomial logistic regression models presented in and computed with other variables held at the mean for each type of school.
![Figure 1. Predicted probabilities of young women enrolling in a physical science or life science major by gender composition of school.Data: LSAY 2003.Note: The predicted probabilities are based on the multinomial logistic regression models presented in Table 2 and computed with other variables held at the mean for each type of school.](/cms/asset/6bbb7828-0423-4ed3-8096-44cda1a56ff5/nses_a_1755319_f0001_ob.jpg)
Figure 2. Predicted probabilities of young men enrolling in a physical science or life science major by gender composition of school.
Data: LSAY 2003.
Note: The predicted probabilities are based on the multinomial logistic regression models presented in and computed with other variables held at the mean for each type of school.
![Figure 2. Predicted probabilities of young men enrolling in a physical science or life science major by gender composition of school.Data: LSAY 2003.Note: The predicted probabilities are based on the multinomial logistic regression models presented in Table 3 and computed with other variables held at the mean for each type of school.](/cms/asset/15214659-fc7c-4128-98c7-65332dd88904/nses_a_1755319_f0002_ob.jpg)