2,765
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Mapping affective circuits of a Twitter trolling attack against feminist arts-based pedagogy during the COVID-19 global pandemic

Pages 642-659 | Received 30 Nov 2021, Accepted 10 Jun 2022, Published online: 23 Jul 2022

Figures & data

Figure 1. Screenshot of the Padlet done during this session with images and comments from students (with their consent).

Figure 1. Screenshot of the Padlet done during this session with images and comments from students (with their consent).

Figure 2. Ringrose’s original tweet was later attacked.

Figure 2. Ringrose’s original tweet was later attacked.

Figure 3. Andrew Old’s dismissive tweet.

Figure 3. Andrew Old’s dismissive tweet.

Figure 4. Ringrose’s second tweet addressed the attacks.

Figure 4. Ringrose’s second tweet addressed the attacks.

Figure 5. Two tweets from Peter Lloyd mocking Ringrose and one student’s Padlet comment.

Figure 5. Two tweets from Peter Lloyd mocking Ringrose and one student’s Padlet comment.

Figure 6. Tweet referring to clitoral validity.

Figure 6. Tweet referring to clitoral validity.

Figure 7. Ironic Twitter replies, mocking and attacking through humor.

Figure 7. Ironic Twitter replies, mocking and attacking through humor.

Figure 8. Nostalgic tweet with Morphs.

Figure 8. Nostalgic tweet with Morphs.

Figure 9. Cunt tweet attack.

Figure 9. Cunt tweet attack.

Figure 10. Tweet attacking us and doubting our mental health.

Figure 10. Tweet attacking us and doubting our mental health.

Figure 11. Tweet attacking Western academia.

Figure 11. Tweet attacking Western academia.

Figure 12. Compensating Morph tweet.

Figure 12. Compensating Morph tweet.

Figure 13. Anti-feminist meme.

Figure 13. Anti-feminist meme.

Figure 14. Vulvas to mock identity politics.

Figure 14. Vulvas to mock identity politics.

Figure 15. Transphobic tweet mocking clitoral validity.

Figure 15. Transphobic tweet mocking clitoral validity.