Figures & data
Scheme 1. (A) Schematic illustration of the QDs-mAb probes preparation. (B) Schematic illustration of the established competitive fluorescence immunoassay for pesticide detection.
![Scheme 1. (A) Schematic illustration of the QDs-mAb probes preparation. (B) Schematic illustration of the established competitive fluorescence immunoassay for pesticide detection.](/cms/asset/db2cfb64-57f9-4021-a8df-e2fa7a23e4d9/cfai_a_1597022_f0004_oc.jpg)
Figure 2. Characterisation of QDs-mAb probes. (A) TEM micrographs of QDs, (B) TEM micrographs of QDs-mAb. Normalised fluorescent spectra (C) of QDs (upper line) and QDs-mAb (lower line). The UV–Vis spectrum (D) of bare mAb (upper line), QDs modified with antibodies (middle line), and bare QDs (lower line).
![Figure 2. Characterisation of QDs-mAb probes. (A) TEM micrographs of QDs, (B) TEM micrographs of QDs-mAb. Normalised fluorescent spectra (C) of QDs (upper line) and QDs-mAb (lower line). The UV–Vis spectrum (D) of bare mAb (upper line), QDs modified with antibodies (middle line), and bare QDs (lower line).](/cms/asset/35824f24-3842-47a0-83c5-6374b03208ea/cfai_a_1597022_f0002_oc.jpg)
Table 1. Optimized working concentrations of QDs-mAb and OVA-hapten.
Figure 3. The standard curve of triazophos; the linear range was 0.01–25 μg L−1; three replicates were performed.
![Figure 3. The standard curve of triazophos; the linear range was 0.01–25 μg L−1; three replicates were performed.](/cms/asset/2f68147a-c559-43e1-a20d-f67b39b381d9/cfai_a_1597022_f0003_oc.jpg)