508
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Impact of UV radiation on the red seaweed Gelidium lingulatum and its associated bacteria

ORCID Icon, , , &
Pages 129-141 | Received 13 Sep 2019, Accepted 23 May 2020, Published online: 07 Jul 2020

Figures & data

Fig. 1 Experimental analysis of Gelidium lingulatum: (a) geographic location of sampling sites along the Chilean coast, (b) annual mean values of photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) at seaweed sampling sites, (c) view of G. lingulatum growing on shells during acclimatization to outdoor conditions, (d) view of seaweed thallus where the rectangle indicates the sector used for photosynthesis and bacterial analysis, (e) view of bacterial community on the thallus surface of G. lingulatum using SEM

Fig. 1 Experimental analysis of Gelidium lingulatum: (a) geographic location of sampling sites along the Chilean coast, (b) annual mean values of photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) at seaweed sampling sites, (c) view of G. lingulatum growing on shells during acclimatization to outdoor conditions, (d) view of seaweed thallus where the rectangle indicates the sector used for photosynthesis and bacterial analysis, (e) view of bacterial community on the thallus surface of G. lingulatum using SEM

Table 1. Results of the two-way ANOVA with repeated measurements for the between-subject effects of the factors Population (La Pampilla, Maitencillo and Mar Brava) and the within-subject factor Time (days of experimentation) on: (a) Inhibition of maximal quantum yield (Fv/Fm) after 2 h of exposure, and (b) Fv/Fm under recovery (values as % of control). * indicates significant differences

Fig. 2 Changes in percentages of inhibition and recovery of maximum quantum yield (Fv/Fm) of G. lingulatum populations. (a) UV-induced inhibition of Fv/Fm after 2 h of exposure (calculated as the decrease in per cent of the mean Fv/Fm value of the corresponding control under PAR), and (b) Fv/Fm as percentage of the corresponding control after 19 h of recovery post UV-exposure. Values are mean (n = 3) ± SD. Values that are significantly different (Tukey, ANOVA) between each other at p < 0.05 are indicated by different letters above the bars. Similar values are joined by a horizontal line

Fig. 2 Changes in percentages of inhibition and recovery of maximum quantum yield (Fv/Fm) of G. lingulatum populations. (a) UV-induced inhibition of Fv/Fm after 2 h of exposure (calculated as the decrease in per cent of the mean Fv/Fm value of the corresponding control under PAR), and (b) Fv/Fm as percentage of the corresponding control after 19 h of recovery post UV-exposure. Values are mean (n = 3) ± SD. Values that are significantly different (Tukey, ANOVA) between each other at p < 0.05 are indicated by different letters above the bars. Similar values are joined by a horizontal line

Table 2. Results of the two-way ANOVA for the factors Population (La Pampilla, Maitencillo and Mar Brava) and Radiation Condition (initial before start experiment, and after 5 days under PAR and PAR+UV) on densities of bacteria (cell mm–2)

Fig. 3 The densities (cells mm–2) of bacteria on Gelidium lingulatum thalli. Initial – acclimated thalli samples before the experiment. UV – thalli exposed to PAR+UV. Control – thalli exposed to PAR only. Field – field thalli samples. Values are mean ± SD (n = 12). Different letters above the bars indicated significant differences according to the Tukey post hoc test at p < 0.05

Fig. 3 The densities (cells mm–2) of bacteria on Gelidium lingulatum thalli. Initial – acclimated thalli samples before the experiment. UV – thalli exposed to PAR+UV. Control – thalli exposed to PAR only. Field – field thalli samples. Values are mean ± SD (n = 12). Different letters above the bars indicated significant differences according to the Tukey post hoc test at p < 0.05

Fig. 4 Hierarchical agglomerative clustering based on Bray–Curtis similarity of microbial communities associated with Gelidium lingulatum thalli from La Pampilla before (initial) and after the experiment (UV and control) and present in seawater during the period of the study. Field – microbial communities associated with field seaweeds. Individual replicates denominated by different numbers (1–3)

Fig. 4 Hierarchical agglomerative clustering based on Bray–Curtis similarity of microbial communities associated with Gelidium lingulatum thalli from La Pampilla before (initial) and after the experiment (UV and control) and present in seawater during the period of the study. Field – microbial communities associated with field seaweeds. Individual replicates denominated by different numbers (1–3)

Table 3. Diversity of microbial communities (mean ± SD) associated with Gelidium lingulatum thalli from La Pampilla before (initial) and after the experiment (UV and control) and present in seawater during the period of the study. Field – microbial communities associated with field thalli. Individual replicates denominated by different numbers (1–3). Different letters indicated significant differences according to the LSD post hoc test at p < 0.05

Fig. 5 The main classes of bacteria associated with Gelidium lingulatum from La Pampilla before (S) and after the experiment and present in seawater (SW) during the period of the study. F – microbial communities associated with field thalli. C – microbial communities on control (just PAR). UV – microbial communities on thalli that were exposed to PAR+UV. Data are the mean percentage (n = 3) of OTUs belonging to classes of bacteria

Fig. 5 The main classes of bacteria associated with Gelidium lingulatum from La Pampilla before (S) and after the experiment and present in seawater (SW) during the period of the study. F – microbial communities associated with field thalli. C – microbial communities on control (just PAR). UV – microbial communities on thalli that were exposed to PAR+UV. Data are the mean percentage (n = 3) of OTUs belonging to classes of bacteria

Fig. 6 The main genera of bacteria (> 5% of total abundance) associated with Gelidium lingulatum from La Pampilla before (S) and after the experiment and present in seawater (SW) during the period of the study. F – microbial communities associated with field thalli. C – microbial communities on control thalli (just PAR). UV – microbial communities on thalli that were exposed to PAR+UV. Different replicates denominated by different numbers

Fig. 6 The main genera of bacteria (> 5% of total abundance) associated with Gelidium lingulatum from La Pampilla before (S) and after the experiment and present in seawater (SW) during the period of the study. F – microbial communities associated with field thalli. C – microbial communities on control thalli (just PAR). UV – microbial communities on thalli that were exposed to PAR+UV. Different replicates denominated by different numbers
Supplemental material

TEJP-2019-0111-File004.docx

Download MS Word (257.3 KB)

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.