2,005
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples and multinational federalism in Australia

ORCID Icon
Pages 307-336 | Published online: 20 Dec 2018
 

ABSTRACT

Democratic governance is premised on the belief that all citizens are empowered to shape the society in which they live. Over generations, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples have maintained that Australian democratic practice does not live up to this ideal, contending that the state's legal and political framework does not empower them with the capacity to have their voices heard and their interests considered in the processes of government. However, non-Indigenous Australians remain suspicious of Indigenous-specific political and legal mechanisms designed to rectify this structural fault. In this paper, I argue that this suspicion – and Australia's governance framework more broadly – arises from a particular conception of democratic theory that marginalises Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoplehood. If, as the Uluru Statement from the Heart calls for, Australia's political institutions are to be rebuilt so as to empower Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples ‘to take a rightful place in [their] own country’, that conception of democratic theory must first be revealed and re-centred. Multinational federalism offers one path towards a more equitable future.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.

Notes on contributor

Harry Hobbs is a Lecturer in the Faulty of Law, University of Technology Sydney, and a PhD Candidate in the Faculty of Law, University of New South Wales. Thanks to Ulf Mörkenstam, Paul Patton, Stephen Young, Bradley Gooding, and participants at the Australasian Society of Legal Philosophy, Auckland, 14–16 July 2017, and the Political Theory workshop at Stockholm University, 5 October 2017, for helpful comments on earlier drafts.

Notes

1 Referendum Council (Citation2017) p i.

2 Dodson and Cronin (Citation2011) p 193.

3 Pearson (Citation2007).

4 See for example: Dahl (Citation1956) p 36; Ely (Citation1980) p 73; Shapiro (Citation2003) p 76.

5 Pitty (Citation2009) p 29.

6 Nootens (Citation2013) p 58.

7 Dodson (Citation1997) p 59; Rowse (Citation2000) p 86.

8 Keating (Citation2001) p 39.

9 See e.g. Watson (Citation2015).

10 Referendum Council (Citation2017) p i.

11 Referendum Council (Citation2017) p i.

12 Newman (Citation2017) p 225.

13 Pettit (Citation2012) p 22.

14 Pogge (Citation1997) p 179.

15 Williams (Citation2000) p 648.

16 Constitution of Australia (Citation1901), ss. 25, 127.

17 Commonwealth Electoral Act 1962 (Cth) s. 2. See Goot (Citation2006) pp 518–532 for complexities.

18 Hobbs (Citation2018) p 176.

19 Davis and Lemezina (Citation2010) p 241.

20 Davis (Citation2016) p 86 (emphasis in original).

21 Laws (Citation2000).

22 Robbins (Citation2007) p 315.

23 Anderson (Citation1983).

24 Simpson (Citation2014) p 16.

25 Howard quoted in Behrendt (Citation2003) p 3. See further Ivanitz (Citation2002).

26 Referendum Council (Citation2017) i; Anaya (Citation2004) p 21; Schulte-Tenckhoff (Citation2012) p 68.

27 Kymlicka (Citation2011) p 188. See UNDRIP arts 6, 8(1)-(2), 9, 33, 36(1).

28 See for example Native Title Act 1993 (Cth).

29 See for example Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Heritage Protection Act 1984 (Cth).

30 Lino (Citation2017) p 121. See further Rowse (Citation1992).

31 Moore (Citation1902) p 329.

32 Rowe v Electoral Commissioner (Citation2010) 243 CLR 1 at 112 [344] (Crennan J).

33 McKinlay v Commonwealth (Citation1975) 135 CLR 1, 24 (Barwick CJ).

34 Ludwick (Citation2016) p 45.

35 Cronin (Citation2017) p 235.

36 Māori Representation Act 1867 (NZ).

37 Electoral Act 1993 (NZ) s 45.

38 Commonwealth of Australia (Citation2012) p 95. See further Reilly (Citation2001) p 96.

39 Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet Citation2017.

40 UNGA, 61st sess, 107th plen mtg, UN Doc A/61/PV.107 (13 September Citation2007) p 11 (Hill, Australia).

41 UNGA, 61st sess, 107th plen mtg, UN Doc A/61/PV.107 (13 September Citation2007) p 13 (McNee, Canada).

42 UNGA, 61st sess, 107th plen mtg, UN Doc A/61/PV.107 (13 September Citation2007) p 14 (Banks, New Zealand).

43 United States Department of State (Citation2007).

44 Gover (Citation2015) p 345.

45 Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Commission Act 1989 (Cth) s 7.

46 Commonwealth, Parliamentary Debates, House of Representatives, 11 April 1989, p 1328 (John Howard).

47 Commonwealth, Parliamentary Debates, Senate, 18 August 1989, p 395 (Jim Short); Commonwealth, Parliamentary Debates, Senate, 30 August 1989, p 641 (Florence Bjelke-Petersen); 11 April 1989, p 1341 (Chris Miles) (a ‘black power parliament’).

48 Commonwealth, Parliamentary Debates, Senate, 17 October 1989, p 2014 (Jim Short) (discussing the Preamble to the Bill).

49 Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Commission Amendment Act 2005 (Cth).

50 ABC Radio National (2004).

51 Grattan (Citation2004).

52 Vanstone (Citation2004) p 4.

53 See Arcioni (Citation2014a).

54 Referendum Council (Citation2017) p i.

55 Tierney (Citation2007) pp 230-231; Nootens (Citation2009) p 281.

56 Moreton-Robinson (Citation2017). Even multiculturalism, which offers public and private space for minority groups to maintain and develop their culture, heritage and traditions, remains an integrative policy that ignores aspirations for autonomy: Kane (Citation1997) p 541.

57 Tierney (Citation2017) p 235. See also Requejo (Citation2004) p 37.

58 On persistent electoral minorities and democratic design see Hobbs (Citation2017) p 341.

59 Dahl (Citation1970) p 49.

60 Nicholas (2014) p 111.

61 Temin (Citation2016) p 96.

62 Nimni (Citation2015) pp 61–62.

63 As Sákéj Youngblood Henderson explains, undifferentiated citizenship rights bestowed by the settler state, ‘offer[]only the silence and anguish of minority interest group status’: Henderson (Citation2002) p 433.

64 Temin (Citation2016) 121.

65 Australian Electoral Commission (Citation2016) pp 18, 45.

66 Kauanui (Citation2008) p 635. See further Bruyneel (Citation2007) p 19.

67 Rawls (Citation1999) p 327.

68 Taylor (Citation2002) p 239.

69 Pildes (Citation2004) p 2 (describing, not endorsing this account).

70 Tubman (Citation1951) p 508.

71 Nootens (2008) p 277. An electoral loss may refer to a defeat on the floor of either House of Parliament, but it can also refer to a recurrent failure to have issues of considerable importance even debated in Parliament.

72 Human Rights Act 2004 (ACT); Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities Act 2006 (Vic).

73 See for example Williams and Reynolds (Citation2017).

74 The prohibition of racial discrimination was central to the decision in Mabo v Queensland (No 2) (1992) 175 CLR 1.

75 Kingsbury (Citation2001) p 189.

76 Lino (Citation2010) p 860.

77 Aroney, Prasser and Taylor (Citation2012) pp 274–278.

78 Official Record of the Proceedings and Debates of the Australasian Federation Conference, Melbourne, 10 February 1890, 20.

79 Cole (Citation1971) p 511.

80 Riker (Citation1964).

81 Resnick (Citation1994) p 71.

82 Mansell (Citation2016).

83 Lino (Citation2017) p 128.

84 Dicey (Citation1959) p 141.

85 Newman (Citation2017) p 217.

86 Tierney (Citation2017) p 236; Mörkenstam (Citation2015) p 641.

87 Arcioni (Citation2014b) p 18; Lino (Citation2018) pp 243–247; Nichols (Citation2011) p 111.

88 Constitution of Australia, s. 128; Bistricic v Rokov (Citation1976) 135 CLR 552, at 566 (Murphy J); Australian Capital Television Pty Ltd v Commonwealth (Citation1992) 177 CLR 106, at 138 (Mason CJ); Theophanous v Herald & Weekly Times Ltd (Citation1994) 182 CLR 104, at 171 (Deane J); McGinty v Western Australia (Citation1996) 186 CLR 140, at 230 (McHugh J).

89 Cabrera (Citation2014) p 229.

90 Blokker (Citation2011) p 406.

91 Greenfeld (Citation1992) p 10.

92 Miller (Citation1995) p 30.

93 de Tocqueville (Citation1835) p 373.

94 Mill (Citation1861) p 232.

95 Nootens (Citation2013) p 58; Rosenfeld (Citation1993) p 502.

96 Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen, Citation1789, art 6.

97 Keitner (Citation2007) p 43.

98 Hont (Citation1994) p 192.

99 Tully (Citation1995) p 63.

100 Tully (Citation1995) p 63. See also Parekh (Citation2000) pp 181–183.

101 Chambers (Citation2004) p 155.

102 Nootens (Citation2009) p 279.

103 Dahl (Citation1999) pp 119–131.

104 Shapiro and Hacker-Cordon (Citation1999) p 1.

105 Dahl (Citation1999) p 3; Carens (Citation2005) p 1; Yack (Citation2001) p 523.

106 Whelan (Citation1983) p 16. See also Dworkin (Citation2011) p 382.

107 Espejo (Citation2014) p 474.

108 Goodin (Citation2007) p 43.

109 Young (Citation2000) p 52.

110 Gover (Citation2010) p 63; See also Gover (Citation2014) p 201.

111 Though Cf. MacDonald (Citation2014) p 608.

112 See for example Goodin (Citation2007); Arrhenius (Citation2005); Dahl (Citation1970) p 64; Cohen (Citation1971) p 8.

113 Held (Citation2004) p 371.

114 Saunders (Citation2000); Reilly (Citation2006); McMillan (Citation2016); Crowe (Citation2016); Lino (Citation2017).

115 Lino (Citation2017) p 124.

116 Temin (Citation2016) p 95.

117 Harty and Murphy (Citation2005) p 80.

118 Monture-Angus (Citation1999) p 12.

119 Åhrén (Citation2016) p 138–143.

120 Åhrén (Citation2016) p 139.

121 Åhrén (Citation2016) p 139.

122 Dahl (Citation1999) pp 97–105; Dahl (Citation1998) pp 69–80.

123 Roughan (Citation2013) p 213; Held (Citation2004) p 371.

124 UNDRIP art 4.

125 UNDRIP arts 8, 10–15, 25–26. See further Kalkaringi (Citation1998).

126 Joint Standing Committee on Electoral Matters (Citation2017) p 39, Recommendation 3; Electoral Amendment (Banning Foreign Donations) Bill 2017.

127 Human Rights Council (Citation2011).

128 Lov om Sametinget og andre samiske rettsforhold (1987)

129 Sametingslag (Citation1992)

130 Act on the Sámi Parliament (Citation1995).

131 Josefsen (Citation2011) p 36. See also Robbins (Citation2015) p 73.

132 Falch, Selle and Strømsnes (Citation2016) p 135.

133 Larson and Lewis-Mendoza (Citation2012) p 183.

134 The Case of the Mayagna (Sumo) Awas Tingni Community v Nicaragua, Inter-Am. Ct. H.R. (Ser. C) No. 79 (Judgment on merits and reparations of 31 August 2001).

135 Nunavut Act SC Citation1993, c. 28, s 23.

136 Act on Greenland Self-Government (Act No. 473, 2009) Ch 2, Schedule II.

137 Aboriginal Land Rights (Northern Territory) Act 1976 (Cth) s 23. Prescribed Bodies Corporate undertake similar tasks: Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) s 55.

138 Frith (Citation2013).

139 Native Title (Prescribed Bodies Corporate) Regulations 1999 (Cth) reg 6.

140 Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Commission Act 1989 (Cth) s 7(1) (emphasis added).

141 Pratt and Bennett (Citation2004) p 8.

142 Sanders (Citation2002).

143 Sanders (Citation2005) p 203.

144 Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Commission Act (No. 3) 1993 (Cth) Part 31 and Schedule 4.

145 Commonwealth, Parliamentary Debates, House of Representatives, 24 August 1988, p 252 (Gerry Hand); Tickner (Citation2001) p 48; O’Donoghue (Citation1994) p 12.

146 Chesterman and Galligan (Citation1998) p 213; Robbins (Citation2010) p 269.

147 Godlewska and Webber (Citation2007) pp 17-18; Hobbs and Williams (Citation2018) p 18.

148 See Maa-nulth First Nations Final Agreement (Citation2008) art 1.8.1.

149 Nisga’a Final Agreement (Citation1999), Chps 10–12.

150 Nisga’a Final Agreement (Citation1999), art 11(13). See further Rynard (Citation2000) pp 217, 230–235.

151 Though note that First Nations jurisdiction is more limited than provincial jurisdiction.

152 A similar convention exists in the UK with regard Scotland: Sewel Convention. See: United Kingdom, Parliamentary Debates, House of Lords, 21 July 1998, vol 592, col 791 (Lord Sewel).

153 Mörkenstam (Citation2015) p 644.

154 Krook and O’Brien (Citation2010) p 253.

155 New Zealand: Maori Representation Act 1867 (NZ); Colombia: Constitution of Colombia, 6 July 1991, Arts 171, 176; Venezuela: Bolivarian Constitution of Venezuela, 20 December 1999, Art 125.

156 Catt and Murphy (Citation2002) p 49.

157 Phillips (Citation1995) p 176.

158 Hodzic and Mraovic (Citation2015) p 418.

159 Shetreet (Citation2009) p 311.

160 Supreme Court Act (RSC, Citation1985, c S-26), s 6.

161 Reference re Supreme Court Act, ss 5 and 6 [2014] SCC 21

162 Three are selected from Ontario, two from the Western Provinces, and one from the Atlantic Provinces.

163 Special Act of 6 January 1989 on the Constitutional Court, arts 31 and 34.4

164 Comella (Citation2009) p 45.

165 Shetreet (Citation2009) p 311.

166 Senate Select Committee on the Administration of Aboriginal Affairs (Citation1989).

167 Dillon (Citation1996) p 100.

168 Hannaford, Huggins and Collins (Citation2003a) p 36. This is, of course, reflective of the fact that Indigenous peoples are distinguishable from other interest or lobby groups.

169 Hannaford, Huggins and Collins (Citation2003a) p 36.

170 Council for Aboriginal Reconciliation (Citation1996) Recommendation 18.

171 Council for Aboriginal Reconciliation (Citation1996) p 45. The 2003 Hannaford Review recommended the ATSIC Chair have observer status at COAG meetings for all discussions on Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Affairs: Hannaford, Huggins and Collins (Citation2003b) Recommendation 44.

172 Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Commission (Citation1995) Recommendation 26.

173 Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Commission (Citation1995) para [4.27].

174 Referendum Council (Citation2017) Recommendation 1. Pearson (Citation2014); Cape York Institute (Citation2014). The body bears some similarities to an Indigenous Review Council proposed by John Chesterman: Chesterman (Citation2008) p 421.

175 Kymlicka (Citation1993) p 74; Kymlicka (Citation1998) p 114.

176 Reilly (Citation2001) pp 84 and 97.

177 Williams (Citation2004) p 93.

178 Referendum Council (Citation2017) p i (emphasis in original).

179 Mansell (Citation2016) p 187.

180 Mansell (Citation2016) p 195. See also Curry (Citation2000) p 38.

181 New Zealand Royal Commission on Electoral Systems (Citation1986) p 87.

182 Geddis (Citation2006) p 348.

183 Murphy (Citation2008) p 186.

184 MacDonald (Citation2014) p 614. See also Phillips (Citation1995) pp 126 and 136.

185 New Zealand, Royal Commission on Electoral Systems (Citation1986) p 87.

186 Turner (Citation2006) p 94. See also Tully (Citation2005) pp 213–214.

187 Brigg and Murphy (Citation2011) p 16.

188 Brigg and Murphy (Citation2011) p 21.

189 Roughan (Citation2005) p 298.

190 Simpson (Citation2014) p 35.

191 MacDonald (Citation2014).

192 Ivison (Citation2016) p 15.

193 Borrows and Coyle (Citation2017).

194 Hobbs and Williams (Citation2018) p 1.

195 For an approach premised on treaty federalism see Hobbs (Citation2018) p 176.

196 Tully (Citation2001) p 10 citing Reference re Secession of Quebec [1998] 2 SCR 217 at [66].

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 304.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.