Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples and multinational federalism in Australia

References

• Primary Legal Sources
   Google Scholar
• Cases
   Google Scholar
• Australian Capital Television Pty Ltd v Commonwealth (1992) 177 CLR 106.
   Google Scholar
• Bistricic v Rokov (1976) 135 CLR 552.
   Google Scholar
• McGinty v Western Australia (1996) 186 CLR 140.
   Google Scholar
• McKinlay v Commonwealth (1975) 135 CLR 1
   Google Scholar
• Mabo v Queensland (No 2) (1992) 175 CLR 1.
   Google Scholar
• Reference re Secession of Quebec [1998] 2 SCR 217.
   Google Scholar
• Reference re Supreme Court Act, ss 5 and 6 [2014] SCC 21.
   Google Scholar
• Rowe v Electoral Commissioner (2010) 243 CLR 1.
   Google Scholar
• Theophanous v Herald & Weekly Times Ltd (1994) 182 CLR 104.
   Google Scholar
• The Case of the Mayagna (Sumo) Awas Tingni Community v Nicaragua , Inter-Am. Ct. H.R. (Ser. C) No. 79 (Judgment on merits and reparations of 31 August 2001).
   Google Scholar
• Legislation
   Google Scholar
• Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Commission Act 1989 (Cth).
   Google Scholar
• Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Commission Act (No. 3) 1993 (Cth).
   Google Scholar
• Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Commission Amendment Act 2005 (Cth).
   Google Scholar
• Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Heritage Protection Act 1984 (Cth).
   Google Scholar
• Aboriginal Land Rights (Northern Territory) Act 1976 (Cth).
   Google Scholar
• Act on Greenland Self-Government (Act No. 473, 2009). (Denmark)
   Google Scholar
• Act on the Sámi Parliament 1995 (Finland).
   Google Scholar
• Bolivarian Constitution of Venezuela , 20 December 1999 (Venezuela)
   Google Scholar
• Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities Act 2006 (Vic).
   Google Scholar
• Commonwealth Electoral Act 1962 (Cth).
   Google Scholar
• Constitution of Australia (1901).
   Google Scholar
• Constitution of Colombia (6 July 1991 ).
   Google Scholar
• Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen , 1789 (France).
   Google Scholar
• Electoral Act 1993 (NZ).
   Google Scholar
• Human Rights Act 2004 (ACT)
   Google Scholar
• Lov om Sametinget og andre samiske rettsforhold 1987 (Norwat).
   Google Scholar
• Māori Representation Act 1867 (NZ).
   Google Scholar
• Native Title Act 1993 (Cth).
   Google Scholar
• Native Title (Prescribed Bodies Corporate) Regulations 1999 (Cth).
   Google Scholar
• Nunavut Act SC 1993, c. 28. (Canada)
   Google Scholar
• Sametingslag 1992 (Sweden).
   Google Scholar
• Special Act of 6 January 1989 on the Constitutional Court (Belgium)
   Google Scholar
• Supreme Court Act (RSC, 1985, c S-26) (Canada)
   Google Scholar
• Treaties and Declarations
   Google Scholar
• Maa-nulth First Nations Final Agreement (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Nisga’a Final Agreement (1999).
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples , GA Res 61/295, UN GAOR, 61st sess, 107th plen mtg, Supp No 49, UN Doc A/RES/61/295 (13 September 2007).
   Google Scholar
• United Nations General Assembly , 61st sess, 107th plen mtg, UN Doc A/61/PV.107 (13 September 2007).
   Google Scholar
• United States Department of State (2007) ‘Explanation of Vote on the Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples’ http://www.ucs.louisiana.edu/~ras2777/indianlaw/usresponse.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Secondary Sources
   Google Scholar
• Reports
   Google Scholar
• Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Commission (1995) Recognition, Rights and Reform: A Report to Government on Native Title Social Justice Measures.
   Google Scholar
• Commonwealth of Australia (2012) Recognising Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples in the Constitution: Report of the Expert Panel.
   Google Scholar
• Council for Aboriginal Reconciliation (1996) Going Forward: Social Justice for the First Australians.
   Google Scholar
• John Hannaford, Jackie Huggins and Bob Collins (2003a) Review of the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Commission (Discussion Paper).
   Google Scholar
• John Hannaford, Jackie Huggins and Bob Collins (2003b) In the Hands of the Regions – A New ATSIC (Report of the Review of the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Commission).
   Google Scholar
• Human Rights Council (2011) Final Report of the Study on Indigenous Peoples and the Right to Participate in Decision-Making: Report of the Expert Mechanism on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, 18th sess, Agenda Item 5, UN Doc A/HRC/18/42.
   Google Scholar
• Joint Standing Committee on Electoral Matters (2017) Second Interim Report on the Inquiry into the Conduct of the 2016 Federal Election: Foreign Donations.
   Google Scholar
• Kalkaringi Constitutional Convention of the Combined Aboriginal Nations of Central Australia (1998).
   Google Scholar
• New Zealand Royal Commission on Electoral Systems (1986) Towards a Better Democracy.
   Google Scholar
• Referendum Council (2017) Final Report of the Referendum Council.
   Google Scholar
• Senate Select Committee on the Administration of Aboriginal Affairs (1989) Administration of Aboriginal Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Submissions to Inquiries
   Google Scholar
• Australian Electoral Commission (2016) Submission No 66 to Joint Standing Committee on Electoral Matters, Inquiry into and Report on All Aspects of the Conduct of the 2016 Federal Election and Matters Related.
   Google Scholar
• Cape York Institute (2014) Submission No 38 to the Joint Select Committee on Constitutional Recognition of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples.
   Google Scholar
• Articles and Books Chapters
   Google Scholar
• Mattias Åhrén (2016) Indigenrefous Peoples’ Status in the International Legal System, Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• James Anaya (2004) ‘International Human Rights and Indigenous Peoples: The Move Towards the Multicultural State’ 21 Arizona Journal of International and Comparative Law 13.
   Google Scholar
• Benedict Anderson (1983) Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism, Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Elisa Arcioni (2014a) ‘Tracing the Ethno-Cultural or Racial Identity of the Australian Constitutional People’ 15 Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal 173. doi: 10.1080/14729342.2016.1173350
   Google Scholar
• Elisa Arcioni (2014b) ‘Excluding Indigenous Australians from “The People”: A Reconsideration of s 25 and 127 of the Constitution’ 40 Federal Law Review 1.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholas Aroney, Scott Prasser and Alison Taylor (2012) ‘Federal Diversity in Australia: A Counter-Narrative’ in Gabrielle Appleby, Nicholas Aroney and Thomas John (eds), The Future of Australian Federalism, Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gustaf Arrhenius (2005) ‘The Boundary Problem in Democratic Theory’ in Folke Tersman (ed) Democracy Unbound: Basic Explorations I, Stockholm University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Larissa Behrendt (2003) Achieving Social Justice: Indigenous Rights and Australia’s Future, Federation Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paul Blokker (2011), ‘Modern Constitutionalism and the Challenges of Complex Pluralism’ in Gerard Delanty and Stephen Turner (eds), Routledge International Handbook of Contemporary Social and Political Theory, Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• John Borrows and Michael Coyle (eds) (2017) The Right Relationship: Reimagining the Implementation of Historical Treaties, University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan Brigg and Lyndon Murphy (2011) ‘Beyond Captives and Captors: Settler-Indigenous Governance for the 21st Century’ in Sarah Maddison and Morgan Brigg (eds), Unsettling the Settler State: Creativity and Resistance in Indigenous Settler-State Governance, Federation Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kevin Bruyneel (2007) The Third Space of Sovereignty: The Postcolonial Politics of U.S.–Indigenous Relations, University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Luis Cabrera (2014) ‘Individual Rights and the Democratic Boundary Problem’ 6 International Theory 224. doi: 10.1017/S1752971914000037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joseph Carens (2005) ‘Immigration, Democracy, and Citizenship’ (Political Theory Workshop, University of Chicago).
   Google Scholar
• Helena Catt and Michael Murphy (2002) Sub-State Nationalism: A Comparative Analysis of Institutional Design, Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Simone Chambers (2004) ‘Democracy, Popular Sovereignty, and Constitutional Legitimacy’ 11 Constellations 153. doi: 10.1111/j.1351-0487.2004.0370.x
   Google Scholar
• John Chesterman and Brian Galligan (1998), Citizens Without Rights, Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• John Chesterman (2008) ‘National Policy-Making in Indigenous Affairs: Blueprint for an Indigenous Review Council’ 67 The Australian Journal of Public Administration 419. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8500.2008.00599.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carl Cohen (1971) Democracy, University of Georgia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Victor Comella (2009) Constitutional Courts and Democratic Values: A European Perspective, Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas Cole (1971) ‘”The Crimson Thread of Kinship”: Ethnic Ideas in Australia, 1860-1914’ 14 Historical Studies 511. doi: 10.1080/10314617108595440
   Google Scholar
• Daryl Cronin (2017) ‘Trapped by History: Democracy, Human Rights and Justice for Indigenous People in Australia’ 23 Australian Journal of Human Rights 220. doi: 10.1080/1323238X.2017.1373739
   Google Scholar
• Jonathan Crowe (2016), ‘The Race Power, Federalism and the Value of Subsidiarity for Indigenous Peoples’ in Simon Young, Jennifer Nielsen and Jeremy Patrick (eds), Constitutional Recognition of First Peoples in Australia: Theories and Comparative Perspectives, Federation Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stephen Curry (2000) Indigenous Sovereignty and the Democratic Project, Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Robert Dahl (1956) A Preface to Democratic Theory, University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Robert Dahl (1970) After the Revolution? Authority in a Good Society, Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Robert Dahl (1998) On Democracy, Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Robert Dahl (1999) Democracy and its Critics, Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Megan Davis and Zrinka Lemezina (2010) ‘Indigenous Australians and the Preamble: Towards a More Inclusive Constitution or Entrenching Marginalisation?’ 33 University of New South Wales Law Journal 239.
   Google Scholar
• Megan Davis (2016) ‘Ships that Pass in the Night’ in Megan Davis and Marcia Langton (eds), It’s Our Country: Indigenous Arguments for Meaningful Constitutional Recognition and Reform, Melbourne University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Albert Venn Dicey (1959) Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution (10th ed).
   Google Scholar
• Michael Dillon (1996) ‘Institutional Structures in Indigenous Affairs: The Future of ATSIC’ in Patrick Sullivan (ed), Shooting the Banker: Essays on ATSIC and Self-Determination, North Australian Research Unit.
   Google Scholar
• Mick Dodson (1997) ‘Citizenship in Australia: An Indigenous Perspective’ 22 Alternative Law Journal 57. doi: 10.1177/030437549702200103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patrick Dodson and Daryl Cronin (2011), ‘An Australian Dialogue: Decolonising the Country’ in Sarah Maddison and Morgan Brigg (eds), Unsettling the Settler State: Creativity and Resistance in Indigenous Settler-State Governance, Federation Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ronald Dworkin (2011) Justice for Hedgehogs, Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paulina Ochoa Espejo (2014) ‘People, Territory, and Legitimacy in Democratic States’ 58 American Journal of Political Science 466. doi: 10.1111/ajps.12064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John Hart Ely (1980) Democracy and Distrust: A Theory of Judicial Review, Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Torvald Falch, Per Selle and Kristin Strømsnes (2016) ‘The Sami: 25 Years of Indigenous Authority in Norway’ 15 Ethnopolitics 125. doi: 10.1080/17449057.2015.1101846
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angus Frith (2013) ‘Native Title Corporations Achieving Capacity in Both Aboriginal and Australian Legal Systems’ (Agreements, Treaties and Negotiated Settlements Symposium, Melbourne 25 June 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Andrew Geddis (2006) ‘A Dual Track Democracy?’ 5 Election Law Journal 347. doi: 10.1089/elj.2006.5.347
   Google Scholar
• Liah Greenfeld (1992) Nationalism. Five Roads to Modernity, Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Robert Goodin (2007) ‘Enfranchising All Affected Interests, and its Alternatives’ 35 Philosophy & Public Affairs 43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray Goot (2006) ‘The Aboriginal Franchise and its Consequences’ 52 Australian Journal for Politics and History 517. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8497.2006.00432a.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christina Godlewska and Jeremy Webber (2007) ‘The Calder Decision, Aboriginal Title, and the Nisga’a’ in Hamar Foster, Heather Raven and Jeremy Webber (eds), Let Right be Done: Aboriginal Title, the Calder Case, and the Future of Indigenous Rights, University of British Columbia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kirsty Gover (2010), Tribal Constitutionalism: States. Tribes, and the Governance of Membership, Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kirsty Gover (2014) ‘Inter-Indigenous Recognition and the Cultural Production of Indigeneity in the Western Settler States’ in Avigail Eisenberg et al (eds), Recognition versus Self-Determination: Dilemmas of Emancipatory Politics, University of British Columbia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kirsty Gover (2015) ‘Settler-State Political Theory, “CANZUS” and the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples’ 26 European Journal of International Law 345. doi: 10.1093/ejil/chv019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michelle Grattan (2004) ‘PM jumps, ATSIC falls’, The Sydney Morning Herald, 18 April 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Siobhan Harty and Michael Murphy (2005) In Defence of Multinational Citizenship, University of British Columbia Press.
   Google Scholar
• David Held (2004) ‘Democratic Accountability and Political Effectiveness from a Cosmopolitan Perspective’ 39 Government and Opposition 364. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00127.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sákéj Youngblood Henderson (2002) ‘Sui Generis and Treaty Citizenship’ 6 Citizenship Studies 415. doi: 10.1080/1362102022000041259
   Google Scholar
• Harry Hobbs (2017) ‘Democratic Theory and Constitutional Design: Hearing Persistent Electoral Minorities’ 24 International Journal on Minority and Group Rights 341. doi: 10.1163/15718115-02404002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harry Hobbs (2018) ‘Constitutional Recognition and Reform: Developing an Inclusive Australian Citizenship through Treaty’ 53 Australian Journal of Political Science 176. doi: 10.1080/10361146.2018.1449801
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harry Hobbs and George Williams (2018) ‘The Noognar Settlement: Australia’s First Treaty’ 40 Sydney Law Review 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edin Hodzic and Borisa Mraovic (2015) ‘Political Representation of Minorities in Bosnia and Herzegovina: How Reserved Seats Affect Minority Representatives’ Influence on Decision-Making and Perceived Substantive Representation’ 15 Ethnopolitics 418. doi: 10.1080/17449057.2015.1032004
   Google Scholar
• Istvan Hont (1994) ‘The Permanent Crisis of a Divided Mankind: “Contemporary Crisis of the Nation State” in Historical Perspective’ 42 Political Studies 166. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.1994.tb00011.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan Ivison (2016) ‘Justification not Recognition’ 8(24) Indigenous Law Bulletin 12.
   Google Scholar
• Michelle Ivanitz (2002) ‘Democracy and Indigenous Self-Determination’ in April Carter and Geoffrey Stokes (eds), Democratic Theory Today: Challenges for the 21st Century, Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Eva Josefsen (2011) ‘The Norwegian Sami Parliament and Sami Political Empowerment’ in Gunter Minnerup and Pia Solberg (eds), First World, First Nations: Internal Colonialism and Indigenous Self-Determination in Northern Europe and Australia, Sussex Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• John Kane (1997) ‘From Ethnic Exclusion to Ethnic Diversity: The Australian Path to Multiculturalism’ in Will Kymlicka and Ian Shapiro (eds), Ethnicity and Group Rights: Nomos XXXIX, New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• J. Kehaulani Kauanui (2008) ‘Colonialism in Equality: Hawaiian Sovereignty and the Question of U.S. Civil Rights’ 107 South Atlantic Quarterly 635. doi: 10.1215/00382876-2008-010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michael Keating (2001) ‘So Many Nations, So Few States: Territory and Nationalism in the Global Era’ in Alain-G. Gagnon and James Tully (eds), Multinational Democracies, Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chimene Keitner (2007), The Paradox of Nationalism, SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benedict Kingsbury (2001) ‘Reconciling Five Competing Conceptual Structures of Indigenous Peoples’ Claims in International and Comparative Law’ 34 NYU Journal of International Law and Politics 189.
   Google Scholar
• Mona Krook and Diana O’Brien (2010) ‘The Politics of Group Representation: Quotas for Women and Minorities Worldwide’ 42 Comparative Politics 253. doi: 10.5129/001041510X12911363509639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Will Kymlicka (1993) ‘Group Representation in Canadian Politics’ in F.L. Seidle (ed), Equity and Community: The Charter, Interest Advocacy and Representation, McGill-Queen’s University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Will Kymlicka (1998) Finding Our Way, Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Will Kymlicka (2011) ‘Beyond the Indigenous/Minority Dichotomy?’ in Stephen Allen and Alexandra Xanthaki (ed), Reflections on the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, Hart.
   Google Scholar
• Anne Larson and Jadder Lewis-Mendoza (2012) ‘Decentralisation and Devolution in Nicaragua’s North Atlantic Autonomous Region: Natural Resources and Indigenous Peoples’ Rights’ 6 International Journal of the Commons 179. doi: 10.18352/ijc.315
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John Laws (2000) Interview with John Howard, Prime Minister of Australia (Sydney, 29 May 2000).
   Google Scholar
• Dylan Lino (2010) ‘The Politics of Inclusion: The Right of Self-Determination, Statutory Bills of Rights and Indigenous Peoples’ 29 Melbourne University Law Review 839.
   Google Scholar
• Dylan Lino (2017) ‘Towards Indigenous—Settler Federalism’ 28 Public Law Review 118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dylan Lino (2018) ‘Indigenous Recognition’ in Rosalind Dixon (ed), Australian Constitutional Values, Hart.
   Google Scholar
• Harold Ludwick (2016) ‘Through Black Eyes’ in Megan Davis and Marcia Langton (eds), It’s Our Country: Indigenous Arguments for Meaningful Constitutional Recognition and Reform, Melbourne University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fiona MacDonald (2014) ‘Democratic Multinationalism: A Political Approach to Indigenous-State Relations’ 21 Constellations 608. doi: 10.1111/1467-8675.12095
   Google Scholar
• Mark McMillan (2016) ‘Is Federalism Being Undermined in the Current Surge to ‘Recognise’ Indigenous Australians in (and into) the Commonwealth Constitution?’ 8(25) Indigenous Law Bulletin 15.
   Google Scholar
• Michael Mansell (2016) Treaty and Statehood: Aboriginal Self-Determination, Federation Press.
   Google Scholar
• John Stuart Mill (1861) Considerations on Representative Government, The Floating Press, 2009 (first published 1861).
   Google Scholar
• David Miller (1995) On Nationality, Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Patricia Monture-Angus (1999) Journeying Forward: Dreaming First Nations’ Independence, Fernwood.
   Google Scholar
• Aileen Moreton-Robinson (2017) ‘Senses of Belonging: How Indigenous Sovereignty Unsettles White Australia’ http://www.abc.net.au/religion/articles/2017/02/21/4623659.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Ulf Mörkenstam (2015) ‘Recognition as if Sovereigns? A Procedural Understanding of Indigenous Self-Determination’ 19 Citizenship Studies 634. doi: 10.1080/13621025.2015.1010486
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison Moore (1902) The Constitution of the Commonwealth of Australia, John Murray.
   Google Scholar
• Michael Murphy (2008) ‘Representing Indigenous Self-Determination’ 58 University of Toronto Law Journal 185. doi: 10.3138/utlj.58.2.185
   Google Scholar
• Dwight Newman, ‘Federalism and Democracy’ in Amnon Lev (ed), The Federal Idea: Public Law Between Governance and Political Life, Hart.
   Google Scholar
• Robert Nichols (2011) ‘Contract and Usurpation’ in Andrea Smith and Audra Simpson (eds), Theorizing Native Studies, Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ephraim Nimni (2015) ‘Minorities and the Limits of Liberal Democracy: Demoicracy and Non-Territorial Autonomy’ in Tove Malloy and Francesco Palermo (eds), Minority Accommodation through Territorial and Non-Territorial Autonomy, Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Geneviève Nootens (2009) ‘Democracy and Legitimacy in Plurinational Societies’ 8 Contemporary Political Theory 276. doi: 10.1057/cpt.2008.29
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geneviève Nootens (2013) Popular Sovereignty in the West: Polities, Contention, and Ideas, Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lois O’Donoghue (1994) ‘Keynote Address: Australian Government and Self-Determination’ in Christine Fletcher, (ed), Aboriginal Self-Determination in Australia, Aboriginal Studies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bhikhu Parekh (2000) Rethinking Multiculturalism: Cultural Diversity and Political Theory, Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Noel Pearson (2007) ‘A Structure for Empowerment’, The Weekend Australian, 16–17 June 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Noel Pearson (2014) ‘A Rightful Place: Race, Recognition and a More Complete Commonwealth’ 55 Quarterly Essay 1.
   Google Scholar
• Philip Pettit (2012) On the People’s Terms: A Republican Theory and Model of Democracy, Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anne Phillips (1995) The Politics of Presence, Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Richard Pildes (2004) ‘Democracy and the Representation of Minority Interests’ in F. Bastida (ed), Fundamentos: La Representación Política, Asturias.
   Google Scholar
• Roderic Pitty (2009) ‘The Unfinished Business of Indigenous Citizenship in Australia and New Zealand’ in Klaus Neumann and Gwedna Tavan (eds), Does History Matter? Making and Debating Citizenship, Immigration and Refugee Policy in Australia and New Zealand, ANU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas Pogge (1997) ‘Creating Supra-National Institutions Democratically: Reflections on the European Union’s “Democratic Deficit”’ 5 The Journal of Political Philosophy 163. doi: 10.1111/1467-9760.00029
   Google Scholar
• Angela Pratt and Scott Bennett (2004) ‘The End of ATSIC and The Future Administration of Indigenous Affairs’ (Parliamentary Library, 9 August 2004).
   Google Scholar
• Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet (2017) ‘Response to Referendum Council’s Report on Constitutional Recognition’ https://ministers.pmc.gov.au/scullion/2017/responsereferendum-councils-report-constitutional-recognition.
   Google Scholar
• John Rawls (1999), ‘Kantian Constructivism in Moral Theory’ in Samuel Freeman (ed), John Rawls: Collected Papers, Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander Reilly (2001) ‘Dedicated Seats in the Federal Parliament for Indigenous Australians: The Theoretical Case and its Practical Possibility’ 2 Balayi: Culture, Law and Colonialism 85.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander Reilly (2006) ‘A Constitutional Framework for Indigenous Governance’ 28 Sydney Law Review 403.
   Google Scholar
• Ferran Requejo (2004) ‘Value Pluralism and Multinational Federalism’ 50 Australian Journal of Politics and History 23. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8497.2004.00318.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philip Resnick (1994) ‘Toward a Multination Federalism’ in Leslie Seidle (ed), Seeking a New Canadian Partnership: Asymmetrical and Confederal Options, Institute for Research on Public Policy.
   Google Scholar
• William Riker (1964) Federalism: Origin, Operation, Significance, Little, Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Jane Robbins (2007) ‘The Howard Government and Indigenous Rights: An Imposed National Unity?’ 42 Australian Journal of Political Science 315. doi: 10.1080/10361140701320042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jane Robbins (2010) ‘A Nation Within?’ 10 Ethnicities 257, 269. doi: 10.1177/1468796810361820
   Google Scholar
• Jane Robbins (2015) ‘Indigenous Political Representation in Liberal-Democratic Countries: A Comparative Analysis’ in Mikkel Berg-Nordlie, Jo Saglie and Ann Sullivan (eds), Indigenous Politics: Institutions, Representation, Mobilisation, ECPR Press.
   Google Scholar
• Michael Rosenfeld (1993) ‘Modern Constitutionalism as Interplay between Identity and Diversity: An Introduction’ 14 Cardozo Law Review 497.
   Google Scholar
• Nicole Roughan (2005) ‘Te Tiriti and the Constitution: Rethinking Citizenship, Justice, Equality and Democracy’ 3 New Zealand Journal of Public and International Law 285.
   Google Scholar
• Nicole Roughan (2013) Authorities, Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tim Rowse (1992) Remote Possibilities: The Aboriginal Domain and the Administrative Imagination, North Australian Research Unit.
   Google Scholar
• Tim Rowse (2000) ‘Indigenous Citizenship’ in Wayne Hudson and John Kane (eds), Rethinking Australian Citizenship, Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paul Rynard (2000) ‘“Welcome In, But Check Your Rights at the Door”, The James Bay and Nisga’a Agreements in Canada’ 33 Canadian Journal of Political Science 211. doi: 10.1017/S0008423900000081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Will Sanders (2002) ‘Towards an Indigenous order of Australian government: Rethinking self-determination as Indigenous affairs policy’ (CAEPR Discussion Paper No 230/2002).
   Google Scholar
• Will Sanders (2005) ‘CDEP and ATSIC as Bold Experiments in Governing Differently – But Where To Now?’ in Diane Austin-Broos and Gaynor Macdonald (eds), Culture, Economy and Governance in Aboriginal Australia: Proceedings of a Workshop of the Academy of Social Sciences in Australia, University of Sydney, 30 November – 1 December 2004, Sydney University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cheryl Saunders (2000) ‘The Implications of Federalism for Indigenous Australians’ in Yash Ghai (ed), Ethnicity and Autonomy: Negotiating Competing Claims in Multi-Ethnic States, Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Isabelle Schulte-Tenckhoff (2012) ‘Treaties, Peoplehood, and Self-Determination: Understanding the Language of Indigenous Rights’ in Elvira Pulitano (ed), Indigenous Rights in the Age of the UN Declaration, Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ian Shapiro and Casiano Hacker-Cordon (1999) ‘Outer Edges and Inner Edges’ in Ian Shapiro (ed), Democracy’s Edges, Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ian Shapiro (2003) The State of Democratic Theory, Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shimon Shetreet (2009) ‘The Normative Cycle of Shaping Judicial Independence in Domestic and International Law’ 10 Chicago Journal of International Law 275.
   Google Scholar
• Audra Simpson (2014) Mohawk Interruptus: Political Life Across the Borders of Settler States, Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peter Taylor (2002) ‘Relocating the Demos?’ in James Anderson (ed), Transnational Democracy: Political Spaces And Border Crossings, Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• David Temin (2016) Remapping the World: Vine Deloria, Jr. and the Ends of Settler Sovereignty (PhD Thesis, University of Minnesota, October 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Robert Tickner (2001) Taking a Stand: Land Rights to Reconciliation, Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Stephen Tierney (2007) ‘“We the Peoples”: Constituent Power and Constitutionalism in Plurinational States’ in Martin Loughlin and Neil Walker (eds) The Paradox of Constitutionalism, Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stephen Tierney (2017) ‘Federalism and the Plurinational Challenge’ in Amnon Lev (ed), The Federal Idea: Public Law Between Governance and Political Life, Hart.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander de Tocqueville (1835) Democracy in America (1835) (Henry Reeve trans, Oxford University Press 1961).
   Google Scholar
• David Tubman (1951) The Governmental Process: Political Interests and Public Opinion, Alfred A. Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• James Tully (1995) Strange Multiplicity: Constitutionalism in an Age of Diversity, Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• James Tully (2001), ‘Introduction’ in Alain-G. Gagnon and James Tully (eds), Multinational Democracies, Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• James Tully (2005) ‘Exclusion and Assimilation: Two Forms of Domination in Relation to Freedom’ in Melissa Williams and Stephan Macado (eds), NOMOS 46: Political Exclusion and Domination, New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dale Turner (2006), This is Not a Peace Pipe: Towards a Critical Indigenous Philosophy, University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Amanda Vanstone (2004) ‘Opening Address’, Bennelong Society (Sydney, 4 September 2004).
   Google Scholar
• Irene Watson (2015) Aboriginal Peoples, Colonialism and International Law: Raw Law, Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Frederick Whelan (1983) ‘Democratic Theory and the Boundary Problem’ in J. Roland Pennock and John W. Chapman (eds), Liberal Democracy: Nomos XXV, New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• George Williams (2000) ‘Race and the Australian Constitution: From Federation to Reconciliation’ 38 Osgoode Hall Law Journal 643.
   Google Scholar
• George Williams and Daniel Reynolds (2017) A Charter of Rights for Australia, NewSouth, 4th ed.
   Google Scholar
• Melissa Williams (2004) ‘Sharing the River: Aboriginal Representation in Canadian Political Institutions’ in David Laycock (ed), Representation and Democratic Theory, University of British Columbia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bernard Yack (2001) ‘Popular Sovereignty and Nationalism’ 29 Political Theory 517. doi: 10.1177/0090591701029004003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iris Marion Young (2000) Inclusion and Democracy, Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar