Wood and non-wood forest products of Central Java, Indonesia

Figures & data

Figure 1. Map of study area, Indonesia, and Yogyakarta Province highlighted.

Table 1. The number of species in the different stands, status (native or exotic) and life cycle (annual and perennial), depending on whether they were defined as rare (occur only once) versus restricted (R – occur in only one stand type), intermediate (I – occur in two stand types) or widespread (W – occur in all three stand types) (R + I + W) in the upper rows of the table, and according to use in the lower rows of the table. Note that some species exist in different stand types and have multiple uses.

Plant category	Teak				Mahogany				Non-rehabilitated
Distribution	Native		Exotic		Native		Exotic		Native		Exotic
	Ann.	Peren.	Ann.	Peren.	Ann.	Peren.	Ann.	Peren.	Ann.	Peren.	Ann.	Peren.
Herb species
Rare	1	2	1	4	1	3	2	4	1	1	1	2
R + I + W	1	5	3	7	1	4	3	5	1	0	0	2
Total	2	7	4	11	2	7	5	9	2	1	1	4
Woody species
Rare		7		4		7		7		9		2
R + I + W		26		15		25		17		15		9
Total		33		19		32		24		24		11
Use category
Medicine	2	37	4	21	1	11	2	11	1	7	1	3
Food	1	23	3	11	0	9	2	9	0	4	0	2
Fodder	1	6	1	9	0	4	1	4	0	2	0	1
Ornament	0	13	1	14	1	7	1	6	1	2	0	2
Construction		14		11		8		7		10		1

Table 2. The number (percentage) of species in different distribution categories.

Plant category	Rare (occur only once)	Restricted (occur in 1 stand type)	Intermediate (occur in 2 stand types)	Widespread (occur in all 3 stand types)
Herb species	25 (56%)	7 (15%)	10 (22%)	3 (7%)
Woody species	44 (45%)	12 (12%)	22 (23%)	19 (20%)

Table 3. The number (percentage) of species in different use categories, depending on whether they were defined as rare (occur only once) versus restricted (R – occur in only one stand type), intermediate (I – occur in two stand types) or widespread (W – occur in all three stand types) (R + I + W). Note that some species have multiple uses and are therefore counted in several of the use categories.

Plant category Distribution	Medicine	Food	Fodder	Construction	Ornament
Herb species
Rare	14 (50%)	10 (67%)	5 (50%)		12 (48%)
R + I + W	14 (50%)	5 (33%)	5 (50%)		13 (52%)
Total	28 (36%)	15 (19%)	10 (13%)		25 (32%)
Woody species
Rare	32 (41%)	12 (39%)	10 (43%)	24 (43%)	27 (50%)
R + I + W	47 (59%)	19 (61%)	13 (57%)	32 (57%)	27 (50%)
Total	79 (33%)	31 (13%)	23 (9%)	56 (23%)	54 (22%)

Table 4. The number of useful plant species grouped by the number of potential uses and stand type. Note that the same plants may be present in different stand types.

Stand types	Number of potential uses
	Herb species				Woody species
	1	2	3	4	1	2	3	4	5
Teak	13	10	5	0	11	21	19	4	2
Mahogany	9	9	7	0	13	22	17	5	5
Non-rehabilitated	3	3	2	0	9	12	16	1	0
Total	25	22	14	0	33	55	52	10	7

Figure 2. The total number of useful herb species per plot (m²) in different stand types.

Figure 3. Interaction effects between (a) plant uses and plant status; and (b) plant uses and plant life cycle, on the number of useful herb species per plot (m²).

Figure 4. Interaction effects between (a) stand type and plant status; and (b) plant uses and plant status, on the number of woody species per 25 m^2.

Figure 5. Interaction effects between plant status, plant life cycle and time since rehabilitation (year) on the number of useful herb species per plot (m²).

Figure 6. Interaction effects between plant uses and time since rehabilitation (year) on the number of woody species per plot (25 m²).

Figure 7. Ordinations with Correspondence Analyses for herb species. Graphs show useful species composition for (a) medicine, (b) food, (c) fodder, and (d) ornament. Significant environmental variables are included with best fit.

Figure 8. Ordinations with Correspondence Analyses for woody species. Graphs show useful species composition for (a) medicine, (b) food, (c) fodder, (d) construction, and (e) ornament. Significant environmental variables are included with best fit.