Figures & data
Figure 1. (a) The apparent morphology of catanionic aggregation in solutions of SSS-CH. (b) The TEM photos of SSS-CH catanionic aggregates. X1 is expressed as the mass fraction of CH (X1=mCH/m(SSS+CH)).
![Figure 1. (a) The apparent morphology of catanionic aggregation in solutions of SSS-CH. (b) The TEM photos of SSS-CH catanionic aggregates. X1 is expressed as the mass fraction of CH (X1=mCH/m(SSS+CH)).](/cms/asset/f082af14-d981-4a31-be7d-efd553786743/idrd_a_1742250_f0001_c.jpg)
Figure 2. Particle size distribution diagram of SSS-CH catanionic aggregate solutions with different X1 values.
![Figure 2. Particle size distribution diagram of SSS-CH catanionic aggregate solutions with different X1 values.](/cms/asset/3be00371-783b-445a-8b8b-929b564b5bf2/idrd_a_1742250_f0002_c.jpg)
Figure 3. (a) Conductivity diagram of SSS-CH catanionic aggregate solutions with different X1 values. (b) Turbidity values for SSS-CH catanionic aggregate solutions with different X1 values.
![Figure 3. (a) Conductivity diagram of SSS-CH catanionic aggregate solutions with different X1 values. (b) Turbidity values for SSS-CH catanionic aggregate solutions with different X1 values.](/cms/asset/25c96146-7f94-4b69-9466-afe1c0e1b73b/idrd_a_1742250_f0003_c.jpg)
Table 1. The zeta potential value of SSS-CH catanionic aggregate solutions with different X1 values.
Figure 4. Drug release results for SSS-CH catanionic aggregate solutions with different X1 values (n = 3).
![Figure 4. Drug release results for SSS-CH catanionic aggregate solutions with different X1 values (n = 3).](/cms/asset/01cd731d-7572-4a76-892e-31ba0da3e1ef/idrd_a_1742250_f0004_c.jpg)
Figure 5. Cell viability in response to different concentrations of SSS incubated with CEM and Ramous cells (n = 3). (a, b) Represents the effect of SSS on the survival rate of CEM and Ramous cells, respectively.
![Figure 5. Cell viability in response to different concentrations of SSS incubated with CEM and Ramous cells (n = 3). (a, b) Represents the effect of SSS on the survival rate of CEM and Ramous cells, respectively.](/cms/asset/a0503396-3e5a-46a2-8d9e-bbfcb7541e44/idrd_a_1742250_f0005_c.jpg)
Figure 6. Cell morphologies of CEM (upper) and Ramous (lower) cells incubated with 100 µg/mL samples for 24 h and 48 h. Magnification: ×100.
![Figure 6. Cell morphologies of CEM (upper) and Ramous (lower) cells incubated with 100 µg/mL samples for 24 h and 48 h. Magnification: ×100.](/cms/asset/b9650d0e-2344-47cc-8b3d-bb68664ad95a/idrd_a_1742250_f0006_b.jpg)
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study as well as analysis scripts are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.