Review of the Medical Student Performance Evaluation: analysis of the end-users’ perspective across the specialties

Jeffrey B. Birda Barbara Zucker School of Medicine, Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, New York, USA

Karen A. Friedmanb Vice Chair for Education, Department of Medicine, Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY, A Professor of Medicine at the Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine, Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, New York, USA

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1980-1839

Thurayya Arayssic Senior Associate Dean, Medical Education and CPD, Weill Cornell Medicine-Qatar and a Professor of Clinical Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, NY, NY

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2469-0272

Doreen M. Olvetd Assistant Professor and Medical Education ProjectManager Department of Science Education, Donald, Barbara Zucker School of Medicine, Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, New York, USA

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9427-3787

Rosemarie L. Conigliaroe Professor of Clinical Medicine, New York Medical College

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4123-1430

Judith M. Brennerf Associate Dean for Educational Data and Analytics Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hofstra University, Hempstead, NY, USACorrespondence[email protected]

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8697-5401

Figures & data

Table 1. Number and percent response rate by program specialty of all U.S. programs surveyed

Download CSV Display Table

Table 2. Overall and specialty specific attitudes towards the usage and influence of the MSPE. Data presented represents the percent of respondents who chose the top two highest anchors on the respective 5-point Likert scale

Display Table

Table 3. Overall and specialty specific attitudes on the importance of each MSPE component. Data presented represents the percent of respondents who chose ‘Very Influential’ and ‘Extremely Influential’ on a 5-point Likert scale

Display Table

Table 4. Overall and specialty specific attitudes on professionalism in the MSPE. Data presented on professionalism components represents the percent of participants that agree that a component should be included in the MSPE. Data on professionalism influence are presented as the percent of respondents who chose the top two highest anchors on a 5-point Likert scale

Display Table

Table 5. Overall and specialty specific attitudes on the importance of an applicant’s academic performance in core clerkships. Data presented represents the percent of respondents who chose ‘Very Influential’ and ‘Extremely Influential’ on a 5-point Likert scale

Display Table

Review of the Medical Student Performance Evaluation: analysis of the end-users’ perspective across the specialties

Table 1. Number and percent response rate by program specialty of all U.S. programs surveyed

Table 2. Overall and specialty specific attitudes towards the usage and influence of the MSPE. Data presented represents the percent of respondents who chose the top two highest anchors on the respective 5-point Likert scale

Table 3. Overall and specialty specific attitudes on the importance of each MSPE component. Data presented represents the percent of respondents who chose ‘Very Influential’ and ‘Extremely Influential’ on a 5-point Likert scale

Table 5. Overall and specialty specific attitudes on the importance of an applicant’s academic performance in core clerkships. Data presented represents the percent of respondents who chose ‘Very Influential’ and ‘Extremely Influential’ on a 5-point Likert scale

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Your download is now in progress and you may close this window

Login or register to access this feature

Review of the Medical Student Performance Evaluation: analysis of the end-users’ perspective across the specialties

Figures & data

Table 1. Number and percent response rate by program specialty of all U.S. programs surveyed

Table 2. Overall and specialty specific attitudes towards the usage and influence of the MSPE. Data presented represents the percent of respondents who chose the top two highest anchors on the respective 5-point Likert scale

Table 3. Overall and specialty specific attitudes on the importance of each MSPE component. Data presented represents the percent of respondents who chose ‘Very Influential’ and ‘Extremely Influential’ on a 5-point Likert scale

Table 5. Overall and specialty specific attitudes on the importance of an applicant’s academic performance in core clerkships. Data presented represents the percent of respondents who chose ‘Very Influential’ and ‘Extremely Influential’ on a 5-point Likert scale

Related research

To cite this article:

Download citation

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Keep up to date