Can patient-physician interview skills be implemented with peer simulated patients?

Figures & data

Figure 1. Mixed-Method Methodological Framework for Research.

Chart 1. Students` performance grade distributions from PROF.

Table 1. Peer-Simulated Patient Success Rate

PPOF Items	%
1. The peer patient focused on the script. (good recall, concentrated)	91,33
2. The peer played the role of patient well.	94,67
3. The peer patient was able to present alternative topics to the topics highlighted in the scenario	95,33
4. The oral communication skills of the peer patient were appropriate (clear, clear, understandable, scripted)	99,33
5. The nonverbal communication skills of the peer patient were appropriate (body language, gesture, gesture).	99,33
6. The peer patient listened to the physician interview topics effectively	100,00
7. The peer patient answered the questions of the interviewer consistently. (credible-reliable)	99,33
8. The peer patient gave effective feedback.	32,00
Total	88,92

Table 2. Triangulation of Patient-Physician Interview Skills Data

Merged Data		%
Success Rate of Being an Interviewer Physician		92,00
Peer Simulated Patient Success Rate		88,92
PatientPhysicianInterviewSatisfactionRate	Satisfaction with patient-physician interview	98,00
	Satisfaction with the fact the simulated patient is a peer simulated patient	84,00
	Interest to have a patient-physician interview in the years to come	92,00
	Finding the patient-physician interview experience helpful	96,00
	Finding the patient-physician interview experience useful	77,33
	Satisfaction of being an interviewer physician Peer-to-peer simulated patient satisfaction Satisfaction of being an observer	80,53 56,66 82,00