522
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Firmness Evaluation by Drop Impact Characteristics for Peach

&
Pages 439-451 | Received 16 Nov 2003, Accepted 17 Sep 2005, Published online: 06 Feb 2007

Figures & data

Figure 1 The schematic diagram of the experimental system.

Figure 1 The schematic diagram of the experimental system.

Figure 2 Typical time domain and frequency domain characteristic for drop height. (Firmness 0.98–1.01MPa)

Figure 2 Typical time domain and frequency domain characteristic for drop height. (Firmness 0.98–1.01MPa)

Figure 3 Typical frequency domain characteristic for drop height. (Firmness 1.79–1.81MPa)

Figure 3 Typical frequency domain characteristic for drop height. (Firmness 1.79–1.81MPa)

Figure 4 Typical frequency domain characteristic for peach orientation. (Peach mass 98–100g, firmness 1.80–1.83MPa)

Figure 4 Typical frequency domain characteristic for peach orientation. (Peach mass 98–100g, firmness 1.80–1.83MPa)

Figure 5 Typical frequency domain characteristic for material of impact surface. (Peach mass 99–103g, firmness 2.20 ± 0.02MPa)

Figure 5 Typical frequency domain characteristic for material of impact surface. (Peach mass 99–103g, firmness 2.20 ± 0.02MPa)

Figure 6 Typical frequency domain characteristic for fruit mass. (Peach firmnesses 1.05–1.08MPa)

Figure 6 Typical frequency domain characteristic for fruit mass. (Peach firmnesses 1.05–1.08MPa)

Figure 7 Typical frequency domain characteristic for fruit firmness. (Peach mass 103–107g)

Figure 7 Typical frequency domain characteristic for fruit firmness. (Peach mass 103–107g)

Figure 8 Typical frequency domain characteristic for storage day. (Peach mass 90–93g)

Figure 8 Typical frequency domain characteristic for storage day. (Peach mass 90–93g)

Table 1 F-values from STAT/ANOVA on the effects

Figure 9 Relationship between dominant frequency and M-T firmness. (Peach mass 102–105g)

Figure 9 Relationship between dominant frequency and M-T firmness. (Peach mass 102–105g)

Fgirue 10 Relationship between dominant frequency and peach mass. (Peach firmnesses 0.76–0.80MPa)

Fgirue 10 Relationship between dominant frequency and peach mass. (Peach firmnesses 0.76–0.80MPa)

Figure 11 Relationship between stiffness coefficient and M-T firmness.

Figure 11 Relationship between stiffness coefficient and M-T firmness.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.