3,683
Views
15
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Developing Minced Fish Products of Improved Eating Quality: An Interplay of Instrumental and Sensory Texture

Pages 11-26 | Received 20 Mar 2007, Accepted 06 Jun 2008, Published online: 08 Jul 2010

Figures & data

Table 1 Formulations of fish burgers standardized at hundred parts of fish fillet

Table 2

Figure 1 Force-deformation data of cooked fish burger formulations indicated by the individual traces and detailed in . Products were compressed at ambient temperature (23°C) with a rate of 0.1 mm/s. An example of the derivation of the ratio of inflectional force to hardness (F i  / F m ) is given by the trace of formulation B.

Figure 1 Force-deformation data of cooked fish burger formulations indicated by the individual traces and detailed in Table 1. Products were compressed at ambient temperature (23°C) with a rate of 0.1 mm/s. An example of the derivation of the ratio of inflectional force to hardness (F i  / F m ) is given by the trace of formulation B.

Figure 2 Handshaking firmness from compression testing, at conditions indicated in , with overall sensory desirability for the burger formulations of (error bars indicate one standard deviation).

Figure 2 Handshaking firmness from compression testing, at conditions indicated in Fig. 1, with overall sensory desirability for the burger formulations of Table 1 (error bars indicate one standard deviation).

Figure 3 Instrumental and sensory hardness of formulated fish sausage as a function of starch content; rest of the formulation includes; milk concentrate (4%), sugar (1.3%), table salt (2.3%), vegetable oil (10%), water (79%), and spices (1.9%) per 100 parts of fish fillet.[Citation55]

Figure 3 Instrumental and sensory hardness of formulated fish sausage as a function of starch content; rest of the formulation includes; milk concentrate (4%), sugar (1.3%), table salt (2.3%), vegetable oil (10%), water (79%), and spices (1.9%) per 100 parts of fish fillet.[Citation55]

Figure 4 Relationship between instrumental and sensory hardness taking into account eight sausage formulations with increasing starch content, as shown in ; the vertical line intersection pinpoints the values of instrumental/sensory attribute of hardness at a starch content of 8% with optimum product acceptability by the consumer.[Citation55]

Figure 4 Relationship between instrumental and sensory hardness taking into account eight sausage formulations with increasing starch content, as shown in Fig. 3; the vertical line intersection pinpoints the values of instrumental/sensory attribute of hardness at a starch content of 8% with optimum product acceptability by the consumer.[Citation55]

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.