Figures & data
Table 1 Formulations of fish burgers standardized at hundred parts of fish fillet
Table 2
Figure 1 Force-deformation data of cooked fish burger formulations indicated by the individual traces and detailed in . Products were compressed at ambient temperature (23°C) with a rate of 0.1 mm/s. An example of the derivation of the ratio of inflectional force to hardness (F i / F m ) is given by the trace of formulation B.
![Figure 1 Force-deformation data of cooked fish burger formulations indicated by the individual traces and detailed in Table 1. Products were compressed at ambient temperature (23°C) with a rate of 0.1 mm/s. An example of the derivation of the ratio of inflectional force to hardness (F i / F m ) is given by the trace of formulation B.](/cms/asset/2dc69e2f-a8ac-4bdb-b3bb-57749b32351c/ljfp_a_325384_o_f0001g.gif)
Figure 2 Handshaking firmness from compression testing, at conditions indicated in , with overall sensory desirability for the burger formulations of (error bars indicate one standard deviation).
![Figure 2 Handshaking firmness from compression testing, at conditions indicated in Fig. 1, with overall sensory desirability for the burger formulations of Table 1 (error bars indicate one standard deviation).](/cms/asset/8b9f2134-77ab-459d-a6c1-e73eb663fba7/ljfp_a_325384_o_f0002g.gif)
Figure 3 Instrumental and sensory hardness of formulated fish sausage as a function of starch content; rest of the formulation includes; milk concentrate (4%), sugar (1.3%), table salt (2.3%), vegetable oil (10%), water (79%), and spices (1.9%) per 100 parts of fish fillet.[Citation55]
![Figure 3 Instrumental and sensory hardness of formulated fish sausage as a function of starch content; rest of the formulation includes; milk concentrate (4%), sugar (1.3%), table salt (2.3%), vegetable oil (10%), water (79%), and spices (1.9%) per 100 parts of fish fillet.[Citation55]](/cms/asset/c99237a4-06a4-4fca-9a5e-451bdd3fa239/ljfp_a_325384_o_f0003g.gif)
Figure 4 Relationship between instrumental and sensory hardness taking into account eight sausage formulations with increasing starch content, as shown in ; the vertical line intersection pinpoints the values of instrumental/sensory attribute of hardness at a starch content of 8% with optimum product acceptability by the consumer.[Citation55]
![Figure 4 Relationship between instrumental and sensory hardness taking into account eight sausage formulations with increasing starch content, as shown in Fig. 3; the vertical line intersection pinpoints the values of instrumental/sensory attribute of hardness at a starch content of 8% with optimum product acceptability by the consumer.[Citation55]](/cms/asset/fd3b9eb5-8e25-4677-8b14-fdae0c0a8c9c/ljfp_a_325384_o_f0004g.gif)